On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> The way it was before it didn't actually test if elf_update failed, but
> rather did something random. !!() is a boolean and boolean
> true can be represented as anything non-0, including negative numbers.
Urgh. Another good find.
Than
The way it was before it didn't actually test if elf_update failed, but
rather did something random. !!() is a boolean and boolean
true can be represented as anything non-0, including negative numbers.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hermann
---
libasm/ChangeLog | 4
libasm/asm_end.c | 2 +-
2 files ch
