> I said something stupid as usual.
> Development of ELinks is stalled, but till it has users is alive.
It was even more stupid.
That's why there is no repeat-until in C.
ELinks is alive as long it has users.
Witek
___
elinks-users mailing list
elinks-
I said something stupid as usual.
Development of ELinks is stalled, but till it has users is alive.
Witek
___
elinks-users mailing list
elinks-users@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-users
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 04:49:55PM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> I agree that this would be sad news indeed, since there is no other
> textmode browser that matches elinks in its feature set.
>
> But even if it really is dead, we can continue using elinks. "Dead"
> simply means that there won't
On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 16:29:43 PST G. Sebastin Pedersen wrote:
>On 1/18/10, Charlie Kester wrote:
>> On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 14:24:51 PST Chris Jones wrote:
>>>On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:17AM EST, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
>>>
Anyway, ELinks seems dead.
>>>
>>>If that turns out to be the case,
On 1/18/10, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 14:24:51 PST Chris Jones wrote:
>>On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:17AM EST, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, ELinks seems dead.
>>
>>If that turns out to be the case, that's bad news.
>
> What's behind this rumor?
>
> If elinks is "dead
On Mon 18 Jan 2010 at 14:24:51 PST Chris Jones wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:17AM EST, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
>
>> Anyway, ELinks seems dead.
>
>If that turns out to be the case, that's bad news.
What's behind this rumor?
If elinks is "dead", what replaces it?
___
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:17AM EST, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
[..]
> Recompile against libtre-0.8.0. ELinks doesn't do 'approximate'
> matching.
Thanks, I vaguely suspected something of that kind.
> Anyway, ELinks seems dead.
If that turns out to be the case, that's bad news.
CJ
__
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:59:17AM +0100, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
> Anyway, ELinks seems dead.
---end quoted text---
I started to suspect this lately, why is that ?
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:51:26AM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> I don't see the familiar /Normal/Regexp/Extended regex options on the
> search popup dialog.
>
> I don't think I have changed anything in the config file, and the
> Options manager under Document-> Browsing -> Searching doesn't bring u
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:51:26AM -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> I don't see the familiar /Normal/Regexp/Extended regex options on the
> search popup dialog.
>
> I don't think I have changed anything in the config file, and the
> Options manager under Document-> Browsing -> Searching doesn't bring u
I don't see the familiar /Normal/Regexp/Extended regex options on the
search popup dialog.
I don't think I have changed anything in the config file, and the
Options manager under Document-> Browsing -> Searching doesn't bring up
anything relevant.
I checked the features.log and it looks like ./co
11 matches
Mail list logo
