Bruce: As pointed out previously, It's a bad default for Enum.reject. It
would leave you with just the nil values. It might be an ok default for
Enum.filter though.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM Bruce Tate wrote:
> The identify function is effectively already the default for Enum.all? and
> an
The identify function is effectively already the default for Enum.all? and
any?, and a few others as well.
Why not make it the default for Enum.reject too?
-bt
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:13 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
> Yeah you could do `&(&1)` or so for an inline identity, though definitely
> not
