Hi,
I would like yo know your opinion about cunstructs like this one. I guess
this is not a priority for Elixir, and I know I can add it to Hex.pm. I'm
just unhappy with the `with` block and I want to know what you think.
I made a simple implementation here : https://github.com/niahoo/ctrl wit
"Why not just wrap the expressions in a tuple ?" Well because you have to
wrap both sides and mess with those commas, which is annoying for editing
code and adds noise for the reader. Tags, on the other side, are clearly
identified as tags, a branching mechanism that is separated from the
expre
Tags are not very important, I agree with you for them being overkill and
having them just in one particular place is not satisfying. That being
said, it's an advanced feature that a newcomer can just ignore. It does not
make the current features worse. The other issues you raise about the with
Hi Tallak,
The functionality is the same as the `with` block where you can also mix
very different stuff. The only difference is the do/block/commas layout and
I added a shorthand to tag tuples easily.
Thank you for your comment
Le mardi 25 juillet 2017 00:21:41 UTC+2, Tallak Tveide a écrit
Yes, it was a proposal for the tagging, but as it has been said, it may not
be a good symbol choice.
Le mardi 25 juillet 2017 11:09:55 UTC+2, Tallak Tveide a écrit :
>
> Ok. Now I understand more.
>
> I believe the use of '|' is new?
>
> Tallak
>
>
--
You received this message because you are
Hey,
I would like to know what you would think about a new interpolation
mechanism that automatically calls `inspect` as the `#{}` operator calls
`to_string` ?
Just like `raise "bad value : #!{var}"` instead of `raise "bad value :
#{inspect var}"` (The operator could be anything, I don't care
it's good enough.
>
>>
>>
>> *José Valim*
>> www.plataformatec.com.br
>> Skype: jv.ptec
>> Founder and Director of R&D
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:17 AM, niahoo osef
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>&
I wrote something like that already, when there was no `with`
: https://hex.pm/packages/monk
But I do not use it that much in the end.
Le jeudi 17 août 2017 13:33:31 UTC+2, david.and...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Yeah, I've read a few of them and found some user land libraries that seem
> to imple
I wrote something like that already, when there was no `with` :
https://hex.pm/packages/monk
But I do not use it that much in the end.
What I use most is
def ok!({:ok, val}), do: val
SImpler.
Le jeudi 17 août 2017 13:33:31 UTC+2, david.and...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Yeah, I've read a few of
Hi,
--no-deps-warnings could be fine :)
Best regards
Le 3 janv. 2018 01:04, "Onorio Catenacci" a écrit :
> If you're getting so many warnings you can't find your output, perhaps
> you've got other issues you should focus on?
>
> I mean I get your point--when I'm doing development I sometimes d
Hi everyone. I would like to know why Mix developers choose not to use a
pure data file for dependencies and application metadata, unlike many other
languages ?
Thank you
Le 9 févr. 2018 20:20, "Louis Pilfold" a écrit :
> Hi Zareh
>
> Given the mix.exs file is not a machine readable format how
Absolutely, maybe the best way is to use fixtures and keep test data out of
code if you have so many data rows that you have to use editor search to
find them.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"elixir-lang-core" group.
To unsubscribe from this group an
12 matches
Mail list logo
