I am -1 (almost - 2) on more syntactic sugar. I don't think the current
syntax is difficult or confusing so I don't believe adding sugar over it is
really gaining anything.
oc
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 1:32 PM Ben Wilson wrote:
> Here's the thing. Right now import doesn't require any special syntax
Here's the thing. Right now import doesn't require any special syntax. It's
data driven, and uses elixir structures that already exist and are usable.
Every single option you listed requires changes to the parser, new language
constructs or both. All to do exactly what we can right now. I don't
