Thanks everyone for your feedback! I think everybody is ok with `fun/1,2`, so let's make it official!
I've created issues in: ExDoc: https://github.com/elixir-lang/ex_doc/issues/1079 Elixir: https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/issues/9295 On Tuesday, August 13, 2019 at 1:16:45 PM UTC+2, Sven Gehring wrote: > > I would be ok with `fun/1,2` but I prefer Christopher's solution using > `fun/{1,2}` since that notation is already used in the core on various > occasions. > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 06:04, eksperimental <eksperimen...@autistici.org> > wrote: > >> Thanks Fernando for bringing this back to life. >> I'm OK. Let's have an agreement so we can start supporting it in ExDoc >> and make the according >> changes to core. >> >> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 14:10:18 +0200 >> Wojtek Mach <woj...@wojtekmach.pl> wrote: >> >> > > Is anyone ok with `fun/1,2`? `fun/*` won't be supported. >> > >> > I think this is already a pretty common way so definitely +1 from me on >> making it official. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "elixir-lang-core" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/20190813110430.52fabd61.eksperimental%40autistici.org >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "elixir-lang-core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elixir-lang-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elixir-lang-core/905569b0-bd39-4362-bc3f-8902de882157%40googlegroups.com.
