[elm-discuss] Re: Discovery: Model /= Database

This topic is a bit all over the place, but just wanted to chime in with a different approach that I've found works pretty well for updating database-backed state, especially in contexts where you aren't syncing with the backend via websockets or similar. That is to follow the principle: no dat

Re: [elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

Why don't you open a PR and see what people think? :) I'm also in favor of having a folder of sample apps to demonstrate the current best practice, and anything else that would be useful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsu

Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Scaling Elm

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Marek Fajkus wrote: > Petr, > > I wonder have you managed to find some time to look more into or think > more about this. I'm curious about new points you might have. > I got home about an hour ago from a lovely but exhausting 4 days tango festival. I'll look int

Re: [elm-discuss] Poll for Intermediate to Advanced topics that people struggle with

I really like this list. I would also like authorization discussed as well. Kurt On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 10:24:05 AM UTC-4, Peter Damoc wrote: > > Scaling. > > Most successful Elm adoption approach has been the NoRedInk approach of > implementing bits of the UI in Elm. > This effectively

[elm-discuss] elm-dnd 3.0.0

Hi, all! Today I have published version 3.0.0. of my drag and drop library. http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/ir4y/elm-dnd/3.0.0 It is ready for production usage and I would like to introduce it to you. There is a complex example of the library usage (chess board) https://github.com/ir4y/elm

Re: [elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

That's great! People have been pretty responsive with calls for examples of code from existing projects, would it be worth adding a section to the template? On Monday, 1 May 2017 17:48:48 UTC+2, Max Goldstein wrote: > > Here, I've set up a repo: > > https://github.com/elm-community/literature-

Re: [elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

Here, I've set up a repo: https://github.com/elm-community/literature-reviews -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroup

Re: [elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

Great idea! What can be done to ensure that these efforts wouldn't go in vain? On 1 May 2017 at 10:14, Oliver Searle-Barnes wrote: > In https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/yHiAJ_wcG3c Max > proposes that we put together some literature reviews. If we're to > collaborate on this e

Re: [elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

I suggest making this repo part of the elm-community org, if it is to be made. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Oliver Searle-Barnes wrote: > In https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/yHiAJ_wcG3c Max > proposes that we put together some literature reviews. If we're to > collaborate o

Re: [elm-discuss] Ports seem contrived when trying to format a value as money

No I haven't. Thanks for sharing. I'll keep an eye on it but I doubt I'd add it to the project. On Sunday, April 30, 2017 at 9:03:09 PM UTC-4, Dustin Farris wrote: > > Also, have you seen elm-plot? > > https://terezka.github.io/elm-plot/ > > I haven't played with it yet, but it looks pretty neat.

[elm-discuss] Literature reviews repo

In https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elm-discuss/yHiAJ_wcG3c Max proposes that we put together some literature reviews. If we're to collaborate on this effort we'll need to consolidate our investigations somewhere. Having seen the success of the RFCS repos for Ember