On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 3:42:20 PM UTC+1, Chad Woolley wrote:
>
> I asked Evan about this at last week's ElmConf, and he said in the next
> release of Elm, there will be changes that make it easier to cache
> dependencies which have previously been downloaded.
>
Yes, elm-install already
I asked Evan about this at last week's ElmConf, and he said in the next
release of Elm, there will be changes that make it easier to cache
dependencies which have previously been downloaded.
-- Chad
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:31 AM, 'Rupert Smith' via Elm Discuss <
elm-discuss@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 5:02:30 AM UTC+1, Gusztáv Szikszai wrote:
>
> I suppose another way would be to modify elm-install such that it take a
>> command line argument that tells it to skip checking for updates. Maybe -o
>> for offline mode.
>>
> There is one it's the --skip-update I've
>
> I suppose another way would be to modify elm-install such that it take a
> command line argument that tells it to skip checking for updates. Maybe -o
> for offline mode.
>
There is one it's the --skip-update I've added it in the v1.6.0
On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 4:32:09 PM UTC+1, Rupert Smith wrote:
>
> I tend to use elm-install to manage my package dependencies, as it also
> caches them locally. However, it needs to reach out to github to check for
> any updates, each time it is run. I am working on a slow internet
>
