[elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 5:03:15 PM UTC+1, Rupert Smith wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 12:30:03 PM UTC+1, Gusztáv Szikszai > wrote: >> >> Also maybe you don't know but I've created Elm-UI >> just for the same reason: to quickly build stuff from the sa

[elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 12:30:03 PM UTC+1, Gusztáv Szikszai wrote: > > Also maybe you don't know but I've created Elm-UI > just for the same reason: to quickly build stuff from the same components > just like Bootstrap. And it solves many of the problems that seems

Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Max Goldstein wrote: > Respectfully, the discussions around components keep happening because > people start them. Asking "how do I have stateful components with > closure/nesting" falls prey to the XY problem, and also misses a lot of the > philosophy of language

Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

> > If Elm provides an official way to use TEA in order to implement Custom > Elements *the discussions around Components will go away.* > For example, if elm-html library would be supplemented by an elm-ui > library that is just as easy to use as elm-html but it is as extensive as > Semantic

Re: [elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Gusztáv Szikszai wrote: > Also maybe you don't know but I've created Elm-UI > just for the same reason: to quickly build stuff from the same components > just like Bootstrap. And it solves many of the problems that seems you are > facing, the

[elm-discuss] Re: Elm, Objects and Components

I'm just to jumping in here, to say a couple of things. You shouldn't need Polymer. Just web components, which are a standard and > implemented in most browsers (probably all browsers on which Elm runs). Well that's not true, other then Blink there is no support http://caniuse.com/#feat=custom-