Not a maintainer, but what about http://faq.elm-community.org/ ?
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 7:31:30 PM UTC-5, Joe Andaverde wrote:
>
> Elm maintainers: where would be the best place to document this use case?
> I'd hate for this to be lost in a sea of threads.
>
> On Tuesday, January 31, 20
Elm maintainers: where would be the best place to document this use case?
I'd hate for this to be lost in a sea of threads.
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 10:41:51 AM UTC-6, Joe Andaverde wrote:
>
> The DOM could still be invalidated and redrawn at any time by virtual-dom.
> I haven't studied t
The DOM could still be invalidated and redrawn at any time by virtual-dom.
I haven't studied the code to see when it decides to recreate an element.
On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 11:57:38 AM UTC-6, Josh Szmajda wrote:
>
> Do you think it's a viable alternate solution for now for an application
Do you think it's a viable alternate solution for now for an application to
not unload any elements connected via ports and simply to hide them
instead? Would certainly prefer your lifecycle events idea but thinking
about near-term workarounds..
On Saturday, January 28, 2017 at 11:27:17 PM UTC-
