> So while I kinda like the idea of some rationalization of the undo
> binding, I _don't_ think having undo and undo-only on `C-x u' and `C-x
> C-u' is a good idea.
Agreed. I really like the C-x U binding: it's not like it's a completely
different command than the one bound to C-x u, so it basica
Will there be official pretest builds of Emacs 22, or is the current
bugfixing process, based off CVS, the equivalent of a "pretest"?
If it's the latter, maybe admin/emacs-pretesters should be updated to
reflect this.
If there is going to be an old-style pretest, is there really anything
holding
Hi,
I would like to announce a new distribution for OS X, which we call
'Aquamacs'. It's a ready-to-run application for OS X that combines the
Carbon Emacs (a CVS build) with a range of packages and customizations
from a number of people that all try to make Emacs behave more like a
normal OS X
From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:11:17 -0500
That needs to be done in order for this patch to be installed.
please find below a revised patch, including two files (lisp/startup.el
and etc/TUTORIAL.jp). here is a suitable ChangeLog entry for the code:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Suggestions for solving this:
>
> (1) New file operation file-mine-p, returns true if the file is owned
> by the "calling user". For non-special files, the calling user is
> the user who invoked Emacs. For Tramp files, the calling user is
>
