Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sep 15, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Richard M. Stallman wrote:
>
>> That's correct -- or actually the GNUstep "version" and the OS X
>> one
>> are the same code, with a few ifdefs here and there. The APIs
>> provided by GNUstep and Cocoa are almost
> A *lot* of source code contains easy-to-miss bugs like this:
>
> (message (format "File: %s" file))
I guess one of the reasons of such bugs is the misleading argument
name `string' of the function `message'. This name doesn't suggest
that it is actually a format string used by the functio
> So how about the following patch, which fixes the case-fold issue,
> improves the doc string, and extends the valid syntax for version
> numbers?
Your patch works for aspell version 0.60.3-20050121.
I also suggest to add another quite common separator `+' to the
set of separators `[-_]' in vers
Want to find somebody to have se-x with right now?
Find a female (or male) friend that just wants to f-uck!
There are also a few who want a serious relationship though
So if you want a long-termer, or a one-nighter, you got it ;)
Whatever floats your boat pretty much!
http://www.achucklehead.com
On Sep 15, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Richard M. Stallman wrote:
That's correct -- or actually the GNUstep "version" and the OS X
one
are the same code, with a few ifdefs here and there. The APIs
provided by GNUstep and Cocoa are almost identical (or at least
largely overlapping; pleas
Perhaps, but it's surely useful to have that information in the files
anyway; otherwise, how would someone know which version of a file
they've got?
They know what Emacs version it came from, and that is sufficient.
___
Emacs-devel mailing
What is needed (I believe) is to go up one level in the split tree, find
the window under the selected window and then resize this. Or maybe it
is even more complicated than that?
Yes, I think you are right. It seems that the only feasible way to
fix this is to make a new interface.
Are you going to install this patch?
--- orig/lisp/font-lock.el
+++ mod/lisp/font-lock.el
@@ -1058,7 +1058,8 @@
'font-lock-multiline nil)
(point-max)))
(goto-char end)
- (setq end (line-beginning-position 2))
+
Just a followup for posterity: Kim Storm installed the following
simple fix to dispnew.c, which has apparently solved this common (for
me) glyph-related SEGFAULT.
revision 1.354
date: 2005/08/16 14:58:16; author: kfstorm; state: Exp; lines: +3 -0
(increment_row_positions): Skip non-enabled row
Eric Hanchrow writes:
>> "Emilio" == Emilio Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Emilio> Putting them in the source files causes spurious
Emilio> conflicts
> Other revision control systems don't have this problem -- notably
> Subversion, which is designed specifical
Richard M Stallman writes:
> Could we agree to refrain from storing meta-data in source
> files? I'm referring here to things like "Time-stamp: ..." and
> CVS' "$Id" and friends.
> I have always preferred not to have such things in Emacs source
> files. It is the people who wrote th
> rxvt.el lacks a definition for [end].
Done, thank you.
Stefan
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
>> I think it hides the actual problem.
>> A `save-excursion' around `with-current-buffer' is just very weird.
> Yup.
>> What happens if you revert your patch and apply the one below instead?
> My bug is gone, indeed.
> I've reverted my change, please install this better patch instead.
Done, t
[completions] doesn't quite fit for an alist, an obarray, or a
hash table, or a function to test them.
...
Regardless of whether the datatype is alist, obarray, hash table, or
function, it represents an ordered set of completion candidates.
True, but I do not think
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it hides the actual problem.
> A `save-excursion' around `with-current-buffer' is just very weird.
Yup.
> What happens if you revert your patch and apply the one below instead?
My bug is gone, indeed.
I've reverted my change, please install
>> Hmm curious ... I'll take yet another look,
> Note that I installed a change yesterday to that effect.
I think it hides the actual problem.
A `save-excursion' around `with-current-buffer' is just very weird.
What happens if you revert your patch and apply the one below instead?
S
[completions] doesn't quite fit for an alist, an obarray, or a
hash table, or a function to test them.
Unfortunately, `collection' does best. `completions' fails utterly.
Moreover, is not the focus on the whole group, not on its individual
elements, members, or items?
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm curious ... I'll take yet another look,
Note that I installed a change yesterday to that effect.
--
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | I've become someone else's
it's a miracle -- http://orebokech.com/ | nightmare...
___
> Actually, it often happens that things like ENABLE_CHECKING add assert
> statements in the macro expansion which causes the args to be used more
> than once.
> As far as I can see, ENABLE_CHECKING has no such effect anywhere.
It does.
See the definition of XSET:
#define XSET(var, t
>> The patch I just installed should have fixed it.
> It doesn't, but reversing the order of with-current-buffer and
> save-excursion in your new version of the function does.
Hmm curious ... I'll take yet another look,
Stefan
___
Emacs-
> > Is it possible to use a group widget as node of tree widget?
> >
> > As far as trying following code, a group widget is not handled well.
>
> You're right. Does it work better with this patch?
>
> Thanks for your report.
Works fine. Thank you.
Masatake
__
I have studied the code in message2 and the functions called by it
quite a lot (hunting for GC-related errors), and I don't understand
the restrictions in the second paragraph of message2's commentary
(included below).
It is indeed not safe to pass data from a lisp string (due to
potential GC), b
Hi Masatake,
> Is it possible to use a group widget as node of tree widget?
>
> As far as trying following code, a group widget is not handled well.
You're right. Does it work better with this patch?
Thanks for your report.
David
2005-09-19 David Ponce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tree-
"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't have time to check the guidelines right now, but shouldn't a
> boolean
> argument's name end in "-p"? That is, wouldn't "must-match-p" be
> conventional (and clearer)?
>
> No. The `-p' convention is for functions (predicates
Hi Richard,
> [I sent this message two weeks ago but did not get a response.]
Sorry I forgot to reply.
>
> Can you fix this bug?
I did some investigation on this bug but was not able to reproduce it
on my version of Emacs:
In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.4.14)
of 20
Is it possible to use a group widget as node of tree widget?
As far as trying following code, a group widget is not handled well.
(defun tree-test ()
(interactive)
(switch-to-buffer "TREE-GROUP-NODE-TEST")
(kill-all-local-variables)
(let ((inhibit-read-only t))
(erase-buffer))
26 matches
Mail list logo