Re: macos.texi updated

2005-10-18 Thread Adrian Robert
On Oct 11, 2005, at 10:44 AM, Richard M. Stallman wrote:      (I guess I was      trying to say, "drop XLFD, and if some functionality is lost, update      the lisp syntax to fix it".)We don't need to change Emacs for that.  You should be able, already,to do whatever you like in Emacs without using

Probably dumb question: glyph rendering on unicode-2 branch

2005-10-17 Thread Adrian Robert
Hi, I apologize if this is a dumb question, but I've been looking through the code and can't figure this one out: on the unicode-2 branch, if a font specifies "iso-10646-1" for XLFD registry/encoding (and then fontset.c sets 'charset' accordingly), what exactly is getting passed in struct

Re: macos.texi updated

2005-10-11 Thread Adrian Robert
On Oct 11, 2005, at 4:01 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:53:22 -0400, Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: In addition, I've been integrating the Cocoa port's font handling with xfaces.c, and can say it's onerous for developers. All of

Re: macos.texi updated

2005-10-10 Thread Adrian Robert
On Oct 9, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Richard M. Stallman wrote: You're right.. But the population of "power users" in this case for whatever reason seems fairly large (just subjective impression), and the requirement to learn XLFD (to compose a fontset, or whatever else) and partake

Re: macos.texi updated

2005-10-07 Thread Adrian Robert
On Sep 28, 2005, at 4:30 AM, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: On 25 Sep 2005 10:20:31 -0400, Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Even in X11, while XLFD is needed at the lowest level to interact with the windowing system, is it really necessary to expose the user to it? In the ol

Re: macos.texi updated

2005-09-25 Thread Adrian Robert
> > screen. I was also trying to maintain backwards compatibility of > old > XLFDs, which I'm starting to think was unwise. I've made two > attempts at > Regarding this, I think it would be good for people working on > Emacs.app, w32, and Xft to get together and try to figure out what to > do w

Re: Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-22 Thread Adrian Robert
On Sep 22, 2005, at 2:03 AM, Steven Tamm wrote: As for the unicode branch, the way that unicode font handling is done on the Mac (ATSUI) is different from the old-style (Quickdraw) that is used in the Carbon port.Quickdraw is based on MBTE and converting it to unicode is hard. I've done

Re: Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-19 Thread Adrian Robert
On Sep 15, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Richard M. Stallman wrote: That's correct -- or actually the GNUstep "version" and the OS X one are the same code, with a few ifdefs here and there. The APIs provided by GNUstep and Cocoa are almost identical (or at least largely overlapping; pleas

Re: Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-14 Thread Adrian Robert
be a perfectly reasonable thing to do. To release this code in a modified version, which runs only on a non-free system, would be deleterious to the goals of the GNU Project. Please don't ever suggest such a thing to anyone. IIUC Adrian Robert works mainly on the GNUstep version, which

Re: Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-13 Thread Adrian Robert
On Sep 12, 2005, at 3:35 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: OTOH if the work can be expected to take in the order of a few months only (i.e. a large part of the work you've done on 20.7 can be reused with little or no changes), it would also make sense to start from the current HEAD (to be 22.1).

Re: Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-13 Thread Adrian Robert
Thanks all for the info; I'll start examining the unicode-2 code.. -Adrian ___ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Release timelines and Unicode2 branch

2005-09-12 Thread Adrian Robert
Hi, I'm maintaining the Emacs-on-Aqua GNUstep / OS X port, currently based on emacs 20.7 (http://emacs-on-aqua.sf.net/). I want to update this to a more recent version but would ideally like to do so against a stabilized / released version of GNU emacs -- just so I know that bugs are my

Re: How to convert char from Emacs-20 internal to UTF-8?

2005-03-22 Thread Adrian Robert
On Mar 16, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: I apologize for the "retro" question, but I was wondering if there was an easy way to convert a character in the Emacs-20 internal 19-bit encoding (from FAST_GLYPH_CHAR(glyph)) to UTF-8 (preferable) or straight Unicode. I'd like to do it fully

Re: How to convert char from Emacs-20 internal to UTF-8?

2005-03-16 Thread Adrian Robert
> The trunk of the CVS repository (which will becomes Emacs-22) > already supports OS X (via Carbon). > > If that doesn't help you because you want to use some other > API, I recommend you start from the emacs-unicode-2 branch in > the CVS repository (which may become Emacs-23). That branch > chan

Re: How to convert char from Emacs-20 internal to UTF-8?

2005-03-16 Thread Adrian Robert
On Mar 16, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: I apologize for the "retro" question, but I was wondering if there was an easy way to convert a character in the Emacs-20 internal 19-bit encoding (from FAST_GLYPH_CHAR(glyph)) to UTF-8 (preferable) or straight Unicode. I'd like to do it fully

How to convert char from Emacs-20 internal to UTF-8?

2005-03-16 Thread Adrian Robert
Hi all, I apologize for the "retro" question, but I was wondering if there was an easy way to convert a character in the Emacs-20 internal 19-bit encoding (from FAST_GLYPH_CHAR(glyph)) to UTF-8 (preferable) or straight Unicode. I'd like to do it fully within C if possible, and it needs to be e