Evil Boris wrote on 29 Mar 2005 16:51:39 +0200:
> PS. By the way, should there be some documentation that describes C-x
> 8 commands, as a group ?
C-x 8 C-h lists the key translations starting with C-x 8.
It doesn't answer your other questions, though.
--
Gaëtan LEURENT
_
Richard Stallman wrote on 27 Mar 2005 04:52:47 +0100:
> I was thinking that C-x 8 is obsolete, but if this is the best way to
> do that, maybe it means C-x 8 is not obsolete. What do people think?
I think C-x 8 is usefull if your keyboard allows you to type most of the
characters you need, but
Stefan Monnier wrote on 23 Mar 2005 20:57:46 +0100:
> I find NBSP to be a source of too many problems, so I think it should be
> kept for those rare cases where the unbreakability of a space isn't obvious
> from context.
>
> Try (add-hook 'fill-nobreak-predicate 'fill-french-nobreak-p)
> Note tha
Stefan wrote on 23 Mar 2005 14:34:51 +0100:
>>> Maybe NBSP shouldn't have whitespace syntax.
>> Whaaa? What syntax should it have instead?
>
> I guess punctuation. An NBSP *looks like* whitespace but its intended
> behavior is to not be treated like whitespace (at leasst according to this
> bug
- Steps to reproduce with a recent CVS emacs:
start emacs -Q
switch some buffer to text-mode: M-x text-mode
activate auto-fill-mode: M-x auto-fill-mode
insert the following text:
blahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblah blah
(note that the last space is an unbreakab
Stefan Monnier wrote on 18 Mar 2005 14:58:48 +0100:
> Huh? I'd never have expected someone to actually suggest an interactive key
> binding for goto-char. But I now see that it even has a menu-bar entry.
> What in the world for?
Some compilers (eg ocaml) reports errors with character numbers i
Johan Bockgård wrote on 02 Mar 2005 20:01:27 +0100:
>> I'd vote for `C-x g' or `C-M-g'.
>
> C-M-g may not work in a terminal/console.
We already have C-M-% that doesn't work in a terminal.
If you need to use one of those functions in a terminal, you just define
them on some other key and that's
Hi,
The gnus version included with emacs CVS is buggy:
In lisp/gnus/nnrss.el, ligne 765 is
(if (and ns (not (eq ns "")))
but should obviously be
(if (and ns (not (string= ns "")))
The is corrected in gnus CVS since version 7.11 (2004/04/29), do you
plan to update ?
--
Gaëtan LEURENT
