Re: MS Windows Frame Maximize in .emacs (again)

2005-06-09 Thread jasonr
Quoting LENNART BORGMAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > The "bug" used to be there because Emacs required an integer > > number of lines on > > > the screen. Now that Emacs handles different sized fonts, this > > restriction m

Re: MS Windows Frame Maximize in .emacs (again)

2005-06-09 Thread jasonr
Quoting Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I plan to do that _after_ the release. > > Cool. > > Could we install Lennart's patch for 22.1, then? (If it causes any > trouble we'll find soon enough during the pretest.) > Lennart's change depends on Kim's change to work reliably, so install

Re: [PING] ClearType Patch

2005-06-09 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > #ifndef SPI_GETFONTSMOOTHINGTYPE > > #define SPI_GETFONTSMOOTHINGTYPE 0x0200A > > #endif > > Makes sense. I just didn't know how close this was, legally speaking, > to copying MS code into GPL'd code, and didn't want to risk it. But > if you say it

Re: MS Windows Frame Maximize in .emacs (again)

2005-06-09 Thread jasonr
Quoting Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Abrahams wrote: > > >I have nothing to add to > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-12/msg00364.html > >except that it's happening for me, too. > > > >Ideas, anyone? > > > > > > > > I think the changes below should make maximized

Re: [PING] ClearType Patch

2005-06-08 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Look, I wasn't rude (I don't think) Not rude, just impatient :-) > Also the name _WIN32_WINNT > is reserved to the implementation and unless we're given specific > permission to #define it, doing so is ill. FWIW. I don't know > whether that permiss

Re: [PING] ClearType Patch

2005-06-08 Thread jasonr
Quoting Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Agreed, but I think the use of -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400 on the compiler > > command-line may be similarly bad (and is the reason I transcribed > > those constants). > > Jason, could you perhaps tell why this compiler switch is used? If > that is because

Re: __GNUC__ == "mingw" in w32.c

2005-06-08 Thread jasonr
Quoting Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >From w32.c: > > #ifdef _MSC_VER > #define COMPILER_NAME "msvc" > #else > #ifdef __GNUC__ > #define COMPILER_NAME "mingw" > #else > #define COMPILER_NAME "unknown" > #endif > #endif > > Is there any reason to consider any _G

Re: Emacs defeats ClearType

2005-06-06 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Incidentally, it seemed to work just fine for me if I remove the > checks for whether cleartype is enabled altogether, and just make the > width adjustments unconditionally. That is not a good idea. Your patch potentially affects performance, since it

Re: More diagnostics for the W32 build

2005-06-05 Thread jasonr
Quoting Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This was tested on Windows XP SP2, but my main concern is about older > Windows versions, like Windows 9x: the changes use advanced > redirection features that are unavailable with COMMAND.COM, the > default shell that comes with those older versions of

Re: Emacs defeats ClearType

2005-06-03 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> When ClearType > >> (http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/Step1.aspx) is > >> enabled on an NT build of Emacs, it's very common for emacs to "slice > >>

Re: Problem with library images on Windows (again)

2005-06-03 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The files are not opened in binary mode or something like that? Its a possibility, but Emacs should be linked with binmode.obj, which makes the default mode binary. If the link with binmode.obj fails and default is text mode for some reason (as happen

Re: Emacs defeats ClearType

2005-06-03 Thread jasonr
Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When ClearType > (http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/Step1.aspx) is > enabled on an NT build of Emacs, it's very common for emacs to "slice > off" a few antialiased pixels on either side of a character's vertical > member. It happens

RE: tooltip-use-echo-area disappeared

2005-06-02 Thread jasonr
It appears to have been moved from tooltip.el where it was preloaded, to gud.el, so if gud is not loaded it has as good as disappeared. I don't understand this decision. Why is this now considered a gud specific feature? It was formerly a user option to have messages appear in the echo area rather

Re: Bootstrap fails on w32

2005-06-02 Thread jasonr
Quoting martin rudalics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jason Rumney wrote: > > > > > Rather than patch the source, can you please try to debug the startup > > code at the bottom of w32menu.c that decides whether to use Unicode > > menu names. Does Windows ME have a stubbed out version of > > unicode_