> From: Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:25:27 -0400
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-devel@gnu.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> It looks like these fonts are free. So it is ok for us
> to recommend their use. I think we should put a copy of them
> onto ftp.gnu.org and re
It looks like these fonts are free. So it is ok for us
to recommend their use. I think we should put a copy of them
onto ftp.gnu.org and refer to them there.
Is anyone here in a position to do that? Eli, can you do it?
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
It looks like these fonts are free. So it is ok for us
to recommend their use. I think we should put a copy of them
onto ftp.gnu.org and refer to them there. Is anyone here
in a position to do that?
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
h
> "KH" == Kenichi Handa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "RMS" == Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KH> someone ...
It may have been Primoz Peterlin.
Roman Czyborra also has http://czyborra.com/unifont, but I believe
that only has a 16 pixel high font.
KH> compiled those files
At the beginning I listed only the files in intlfonts
package and it doesn't include iso10646 fonts. But, someone
(I forgot) compiled those files and built iso10646 fonts
(e.g. etl24-unicode.bdf). And someone added them in
ps-mule.el.
Are these fonts free?
_
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> lisp/ps-mule.el refers to some BDF files that don't exist in the
> Emacs distribution. They are required to print Unicode
> characters. With some Googling I was able to find ones that
> worked
lisp/ps-mule.el refers to some BDF files that don't exist in the
Emacs distribution. They are required to print Unicode
characters. With some Googling I was able to find ones that
worked for me.
What is the situation with these? Did they exist before, but were
removed due to licensing i
