I still don't like this. What I don't like is that a command invoked
by clicking in the mode line reads a number in the minibuffer.
That seems like a bad interface design.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
> Now that mouse-sensitive parts of the mode line look more like buttons,
> how about moving mode-line-toggle-read-only, mode-line-toggle-modified
> et al from mouse-3 to mouse-1?
>
> Yes, that would be more consistent. So please make that change, and thanks.
Done.
Previously
Now that mouse-sensitive parts of the mode line look more like buttons, how
about moving mode-line-toggle-read-only, mode-line-toggle-modified et al
from
mouse-3 to mouse-1?
Yes, that would be more consistent. So please make that change, and thanks.
I support this proposal. Emacs doesn't have convention for the usage of
mouse-[1-3]. It is good time to define a convention like C-x for global
binding prefix and C-c for major mode prefix.
I don't know if this is a good time for that - I doubt it. It will likely be
another wrestling m
> Now that mouse-sensitive parts of the mode line look more like buttons, how
> about moving mode-line-toggle-read-only, mode-line-toggle-modified et al from
> mouse-3 to mouse-1? This helps preserve the idiom of mouse-3 for context
> menus.
I support this proposal. Emacs doesn't have convention
Now that mouse-sensitive parts of the mode line look more like buttons, how
about moving mode-line-toggle-read-only, mode-line-toggle-modified et al from
mouse-3 to mouse-1? This helps preserve the idiom of mouse-3 for context
menus. I realise that there is no mouse face on text terminals but ea
