> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:54:46 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Yes, both MSVC and MinGW builds do bootstrap now.
>
> Thanks,
Thanks for checking.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
h
> I'll send the log attached, because Gmail is not groking the full
> log inline.
Uh, oh, any reason not to compress it? Sometimes I have to use a 28k
modem...
Werner
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
> Please try with
> the current CVS, and see if bootstrap works again for you.
Yes, both MSVC and MinGW builds do bootstrap now.
Thanks,
/L/e/k/t/u
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:43:17 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > I do not know if it is of any interest, but it seems like my automated
> > built worked nicely this morning on W32. It downloads CVS and compil
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:36:19 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> > Please post the transcript of the entire failed bootstrap session,
>
> Entire? Really? Well, OK. But there's no difference between a normal
> bootstrap and this one except on the
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:46:04 +0200
> From: Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Are there any scripts that produces the W32 Makefiles?
No, not AFAIK. They are hand-crafted, I think.
What I was thinking was to _introduce_
From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:32:54 +0200
> > From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This change breaks bootstrapping:
I do not know if it is of any interest, but it seems like my automated built
worked nicely this morning on W32. It downloa
> I do not know if it is of any interest, but it seems like my automated built
> worked nicely this morning on W32. It downloads CVS and compiles with MinGW.
I can *build*. In fact, a single "make install", or:
make bootstrap; -> error
make install
works.
--
/L/e/k
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
P.S. Personally, I think the whole system of W32 Makefiles is in a
dire need of upgrading. It is based on obsolete Makefile.in
prototypes (e.g., DOC is produced by lib-src/makefile, not by
src/makefile), doesn't use some of the latest fixes (e.g., the list of
object files i
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 03:32:54 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This change breaks bootstrapping:
>
> 2005-06-12 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please post the transcript of the entire failed bootstrap session,
beginning with configure, and please also tell what d
This change breaks bootstrapping:
2005-06-12 Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* makefile.w32-in ($(DOC)): Depend on make-docfile.exe,
temacs.exe, and the preloaded *.elc files. This avoids
unnecessary dumping and DOC rebuilding.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
