> > ! ;; Copyright (C) 1997, 98, 99, 2000, 01, 02, 2005 Free Software
> Foundation, Inc.
>
> And BTW, didn't Richard say many months ago that legally speaking,
> years should be spelled as whole? I mean, shouldn't that be:
>
> Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 [et
> ! ;; Copyright (C) 1997, 98, 99, 2000, 01, 02, 2005 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.
And BTW, didn't Richard say many months ago that legally speaking,
years should be spelled as whole? I mean, shouldn't that be:
Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 [etc.]
Yes.
_
Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And BTW, didn't Richard say many months ago that legally speaking,
> years should be spelled as whole? I mean, shouldn't that be:
>
> Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 [etc.]
Spelling the years out also looks much better.
Trying to keep t
> ! ;; Copyright (C) 1997, 98, 99, 2000, 01, 02, 2005 Free Software Foundation,
> Inc.
And BTW, didn't Richard say many months ago that legally speaking,
years should be spelled as whole? I mean, shouldn't that be:
Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 [etc.]
--
/L/e/k
