> It appears to still be true. But it is not just the Elisp manual that
> fails to mention this and should be fixed. The `mode-line-format'
> docstring does not mention it either. Is it intentional behavior?
> Yes and no. It has to do SOMETHING in this case, but it must not
> signa
It appears to still be true. But it is not just the Elisp manual that
fails to mention this and should be fixed. The `mode-line-format'
docstring does not mention it either. Is it intentional behavior?
Yes and no. It has to do SOMETHING in this case, but it must not
signal an error
Richard Stallman wrote:
But the manual does not say anything about an unbound symbol in a
(SYMBOL THEN [ELSE]) construct. Experiment shows that when SYMBOL is
void the ELSE element is used, rather than ignoring the entire
construct. Is that the correct behavior? It s
But the manual does not say anything about an unbound symbol in a
(SYMBOL THEN [ELSE]) construct. Experiment shows that when SYMBOL is
void the ELSE element is used, rather than ignoring the entire
construct. Is that the correct behavior? It should be documented.
Could someone v
