> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (DK) wrote:
>DK> Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
I have quite often used `find-grep-dired' and it has been a
nuisance that the more often needed `find-grep' is not available.
I on
Ar an sÃà là is fiche de mà Feabhra, scrÃobh Romain Francoise:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The name "grep-find" is quite counterintuitive and probably only
> > chosen because it is in the grep package, and so the "grep-" prefix
> > somewhat suggested itself.
>
> I
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The name "grep-find" is quite counterintuitive and probably only
> chosen because it is in the grep package, and so the "grep-" prefix
> somewhat suggested itself.
It's not counterintuitive. It's an extension to `grep', but it uses
find to find files r
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have quite often used `find-grep-dired' and it has been a
>> nuisance that the more often needed `find-grep' is not available.
>> I only discovered by accident that it _does_ exist, but only under
>> th
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have quite often used `find-grep-dired' and it has been a nuisance
> that the more often needed `find-grep' is not available. I only
> discovered by accident that it _does_ exist, but only under the name
> `grep-find'.
How about adding a `grep-find-d
