I'll document it in the Lisp manual.
Please don't. It is not worth taking up space in the manual.
Perhaps it should be marked as obsolete, and perhaps it should
be deleted, but I am not sure.
That could be an interesting addition to http://www.emacswiki.org
Why not post i
> stack-trace-on-error is not documented in Emacs manual or the Lisp
> manual.
I'll document it in the Lisp manual.
Please don't. It is not worth taking up space in the manual.
Perhaps it should be marked as obsolete, and perhaps it should
be deleted, but I am not sure.
___
> Lute Kamstra wrote:
> drkm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > M-: (setq debug-on-error nil
> > stack-trace-on-error t)
> > C-f
> > ;; Open a new window and show the stack trace
> > M-: (setq debug-on-error t
> > stack-trace-on-error nil)
> >
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll document it in the Lisp manual.
Here it is:
*** lispref/debugging.texi 3 Mar 2005 16:28:32 - 1.27
--- lispref/debugging.texi 4 Mar 2005 11:02:19 -
***
*** 166,171
--- 166,185
(lambda () (set
Lute Kamstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know the difference between stack-trace-on-error and
> debug-on-error?
[...]
> On first inspection they seem to do exactly the same.
Silly me: I was testing it in a *scratch* buffer with
eval-expression-debug-on-error on, so errors always t
