>> with this function
>>
>> (assoc-delete-all "." (assoc-delete-all ".." file-alist1))
>>
>> Even better would be to allow a test function like in assoc-default:
>>
>> (assoc-delete-all nil file-alist1 (lambda (key) (string-match &qu
> Is the following patch not right?
>
> *** dired-aux.el 03 Jul 2005 12:12:32 -0400 1.133
> --- dired-aux.el 04 Jul 2005 15:01:37 -0400
> ***
> *** 136,141
> --- 136,143
> (dired-file-set-difference
> file-a
Well, assoc-delete-all will help to fix the bug in
dired-compare-directories.
Sometimes the number of marked files it reports is wrong. That's
because it compares the file attributes of directories "." and "..",
but dired mark-functions don't mark
On 7/4/05, Juri Linkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> with this function
>
> (assoc-delete-all "." (assoc-delete-all ".." file-alist1))
>
> Even better would be to allow a test function like in assoc-default:
>
> (assoc-delete-all nil file-a
> There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all ... or,
>
> We don't want to add assoc-delete-all merely for symmetry.
> It would have to be needed in practice.
Well, assoc-delete-all will help to fix the bug in dired-compare-directories.
Sometimes the
There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all ... or,
We don't want to add assoc-delete-all merely for symmetry.
It would have to be needed in practice.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gn
Lute Kamstra wrote:
Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all
I guess nobody needed it before. Do you want to use it?
Thanks, but after reading Juanma's answer and thinking about it I
realize that I do
Lute Kamstra wrote:
Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all
I guess nobody needed it before. Do you want to use it?
Thanks, but after reading Juanma's answer and thinking about it I
realize that I do
Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all
I guess nobody needed it before. Do you want to use it?
Lute.
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://list
Juanma Barranquero wrote:
...
will do what you want, but it will still share conses with the
original list. Other implementations can use `copy-tree' or
`copy-alist', but really, there's no one answer that is good for every
situation. Kent M. Pitman did a wonderful article about this issue (he
> There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all ... or,
> am I missing something (else)?
If I had to guess, I'd say that is because `assq-delete-all' has only
one reasonable behavior, i.e., as it modifies the structure, you
usually are going to do
(setq alist
There is an assq-delete-all, but I am missing assoc-delete-all ... or,
am I missing something (else)?
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
12 matches
Mail list logo
