I've done this. I'll try to remember to move ChangeLog to ChangeLog-2005 at
the end of the year.
Please don't do that. I don't think it is a good idea to make
a split so close to the current date, or close to the release
(if it has not happened yet).
___
> I think it would be ok to split it at the start of 2005.
> Could someone please do that?
I've done this. I'll try to remember to move ChangeLog to ChangeLog-2005 at
the end of the year. The newly created ChangeLog.11 doesn't currently have
an arch-tag but ISTR these get generated automatical
I think it would be ok to split it at the start of 2005.
Could someone please do that?
___
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
lisp/ChangeLog is not only the largest file (over 1MB) but it's also the most
frequently checked in. For those like me, who are too tight to pay for
broadband, it takes a long time to commit (over four minutes using -z3). The
scaling seems worse than linear or perhaps I'm just ge
The ChangeLog in the lisp directory has got large again and takes a long time
to commit. I realise that a release is imminent but back in the real world
its not. Can we split it again, like last time, to make commits quicker?
Nick
___
Emacs-devel ma
