Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Use case of TIMESTAMP, SCHEDULED and DEADLINE

2006-04-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 11, 2006, at 15:45, Christian Egli wrote: This is interesting. Still using CVS Emacs (and org mode), "P" tells me 1001 for "OPEN TODO ITEMS" (2001 for #A, 1 for #C). However scheduled TODOs which show up on a certain day all have priority -1000 regardless of their explicitly set prioriti

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Use case of TIMESTAMP, SCHEDULED and DEADLINE

2006-04-11 Thread Christian Egli
Hi Carsten On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 12:30 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Apr 10, 2006, at 13:21, Christian Egli wrote: > > > > 1. What is the use case of TIMESTAMP? > > The *intended* difference (which may have nothing to do with > the way things are being used...) is the following: Thanks

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] shell links [was: Version 4.19c]

2006-04-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 10, 2006, at 19:41, Scott Otterson wrote: In 4.20, the minibuffer is now showing the space without the '%20', a nice touch. However, the %20 still does show up in the link text when I delete the leftmost ']'. It's just a display issue, though, because the shell link works fine.

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] org-mode workflow

2006-04-11 Thread juman
Before answering these questions I'll give a short description why I use org-mode and how it fits my full picture... I'm on of the GTD (Getting things done, David Allen) people so in short everything I think I need to do ends up in my "inbox" (it's just a box). I then go through the inbox to see w

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Use case of TIMESTAMP, SCHEDULED and DEADLINE

2006-04-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Apr 10, 2006, at 13:21, Christian Egli wrote: So far everything is fine. But there are a couple of questions: 1. What is the use case of TIMESTAMP? I seem to only have a use for SCHEDULED, so marking them as "Scheduled:" in the Org-Agenda Week mode is superfluous for