> for html export from latex, I recommend tex4ht -- exporting > images is a bad thing since someone who cannot see wont be able > to read something that should be perfectly readable.
To be honest, I did not know about tex4ht and similar programs before your mail, so that is the main reason why there is no option to choose it. Looking at a few examples on the web, I must say that with all respect for the people who implemented such a difficult conversion, the results look really terrible for my taste, even much worse than the equation editor that comes with Microsoft office. So I am definitely going to keep the image option (also because I need the images anyway for the preview). However, the tex4ht output is definitely much better than plain text representations, and yes, you can have them read to you by a program. I will make this configurable and allow something like tex4ht. Thanks for pointing me to it. - Carsten > > -- > Best Regards, > --raman > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ > AIM: emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc > Google: tv+raman > IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode