Re: [Orgmode] Specified time is not representable with org-timeline in 4.77

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
Thanks for your report and analysis. Will be fixed. - Carsten On Jun 14, 2007, at 23:15, Jonathan Moore wrote: I am getting an error Specified time is not representable when calling org-timeline. The backtrace looks like: encode-time(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) apply(encode-time (0 0 0 0 0 0

Re: [Orgmode] 4.77: org-export-region-as-html produces strange output

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Raman, On Jun 17, 2007, at 20:32, T. V. Raman wrote: See attached org input and resulting HTML. Things that look buggy: The example uses a section header, a bulleted list and a table. See list of problems below: 0) The table becomes part of the final bullet. I'd say this is on

Re: [Orgmode] Non-ascii tag names

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 17, 2007, at 0:15, Carsten Dominik wrote: It should be largely sufficient - maybe not 100%, but close. Unfortunately this does not work under XEmacs as far as I know. - Carsten Thanks for tha patch, i'll put it in with a way to get back XEmacs funtionality. - Carsten On Jun 16,

Re: [Orgmode] 4.77: org-export-region-as-html produces strange output

2007-06-18 Thread T. V. Raman
What is strange about col A) I dont know what that element means or why it is there. B) It's also missing its closing tag. Carsten == Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Carsten Hi Raman, On Jun 17, 2007, at 20:32, T. V. Raman Carsten wrote: Carsten See

Re: [Orgmode] 4.77: org-export-region-as-html produces strange output

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 18, 2007, at 15:10, T. V. Raman wrote: What is strange about col A) I dont know what that element means or why it is there. It is a way to specify attributes for an entire column - I am using it to set the alignment - even though usually the table renderers ignore it. B) It's

Re: [Orgmode] Duration Tally

2007-06-18 Thread Russell Adams
I'm looking specificaly at project planning... I like the idea of the key/value pairs under a heading, perhaps later it could be used for other datatypes (TID,DEPENDS,ASSIGNED, etc). I frequently use a tree of TODO's to describe steps in a project plan, and check them off as they are completed.

Re: [Orgmode] org-return-follows-link

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 18, 2007, at 17:33, Charles philip Chan wrote: Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And the documentation of `org-return-follows-links' says Needs to be set before org.el is loaded., i.e. you need to set the variable and then reload org.el, or restart Emacs to make this

Re: [Orgmode] strip date in agenda view

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 15, 2007, at 16:14, NL wrote: On 6/15/07, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This should work out of the box and usually does. What exactly does your entry look like? It is like: *** Meeting 2007-06-13 Wed 15:30-17:00 This is an as yet unsupported way to write a block of

Re: [Orgmode] Problem with ascii export + possible useful search.

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 15, 2007, at 15:26, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: Hi, It seems that under Xemacs the ascii export just appends the new export to the contents of the old export. If you have the old export buffer open already then it inserts the new export into the old file at the cursor. I am not able to

Re: [Orgmode] Is the feature useful?

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jun 15, 2007, at 13:02, Leo wrote: Dear list, Do you think something similar to the following would be useful for org? ,[ C-h f muse-what-changed RET ] | muse-what-changed is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `muse-mode.el'. | (muse-what-changed) | | Show the unsaved

[Orgmode] Re: strip date in agenda view

2007-06-18 Thread Leo
- Carsten Dominik (2007-06-19) wrote:- *** Meeting 2007-06-13 Wed 15:30-17:00 This is an as yet unsupported way to write a block of time, which causes the mechanism to remove the timestamp from the headline for agenda display. However, I must say that I do like this syntax a lot

Re: [Orgmode] Re: strip date in agenda view

2007-06-18 Thread Carsten Dominik
Yes, I know that this was not the first time, sorry for not giving you credit. - Carsten On Jun 19, 2007, at 6:17, Leo wrote: - Carsten Dominik (2007-06-19) wrote:- *** Meeting 2007-06-13 Wed 15:30-17:00 This is an as yet unsupported way to write a block of time, which causes the