| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
| > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
| >
| > Sometimes I wander how many X
On 13Nov2007, at 9:58 PM, Leo wrote:
On 2007-11-13 15:37 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not
turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Well, the fact that it is
Yes, this is a bug, thank you.
- Carsten
On 13Nov2007, at 7:32 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
There are two autoload lines in org-install.el that are missing
the file argument:
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode "Run a command like in Org-mode.")
(autoload 'org-agenda-to-appt "Activate appointme
On 2007-11-13 15:37 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
>> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
>> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
>> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
>
> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] undo in org.el
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.4 (patch 20) "Double Solitaire" XEmacs Lucid--text
follows this line--
FCC: ~/Mail/messages_envoyés
> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
There are two autoload lines in org-install.el that are missing
the file argument:
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode "Run a command like in Org-mode.")
(autoload 'org-agenda-to-appt "Activate appointments in `org-agenda-files'.")
...
They should be
...
(autoload 'org-run-like-in-org-mode "
On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmac
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Another XEmacs user raising his hand -- please keep XEmacs compatibility.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hirgel
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On 11Nov2007, at 6:06 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
I wonder anyone has seen this:
After I do a tag search (for TODO items), if I do "htmlize-buffer" on
the search result, I will get an "invalid face" error. Since I have
quite some customization on my org-mode, I am no
Hi,
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
> still worth supporting it
I definitely think it is. (Although I'm currently giving Gnu Emacs
another try after years of XEmacs-induced productivity ;-)
Regards,
Stefan
-
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there,
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users ar
There will be a solution for this in 5.14.
- Carsten
On 18Aug2007, at 12:19 PM, Daniel Clemente wrote:
Hi,
in a file I would like to write following line:
„Writing [1] you can create a footnote."
But then [1] is interpreted as a footnote. I have tried escaping it:
\[1\] =[1]=
Wanrong Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that as long as the agenda buffer contains a line with a tag,
> the error happens. If I manually delete those lines using "M-x
> kill-line", the error goes away.
Looks like `htmlize-buffer' doesn't like the org-tag face. I cannot dig
this furth
On 11Nov2007, at 6:06 PM, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
I wonder anyone has seen this:
After I do a tag search (for TODO items), if I do "htmlize-buffer"
on the search result, I will get an "invalid face" error. Since I
have quite some customization on my org-mode, I am not quite sure
whether
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
still worth supporting it
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
