[Orgmode] Re: FR: Repeated time stamp, jumping from current time

2008-03-05 Thread Rainer Stengele
Wanrong Lin schrieb: Hi, Right now we can have a repeated time stamp like this: * TODO Do this every month SCHEDULED: 2008-03-01 Sat +1m If I am late and mark the above done on 2008-03-05, the time stamp will automatically jump to 2008-04-01. This is very useful for things like

Re: [Orgmode] FR: date marking in calendar

2008-03-05 Thread Wanrong Lin
Hi, Bastien, Following your suggestion now I can see a pretty list of scheduled things when I run diary, but I don't see any marking of dates in my calendar buffer. Is there anything I could have missed? Thank you very much. Wanrong Bastien Guerry wrote: Wanrong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Orgmode] FR: date marking in calendar

2008-03-05 Thread Bastien
Wanrong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Following your suggestion now I can see a pretty list of scheduled things when I run diary, but I don't see any marking of dates in my calendar buffer. Is there anything I could have missed? (add-hook 'initial-calendar-window-hook 'mark-diary-entries)

Re: [Orgmode] Re: FR: date marking in calendar

2008-03-05 Thread Bastien Guerry
Cezar Halmagean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (add-hook 'initial-calendar-window-hook 'mark-diary-entries) If %%(org-diary :scheduled :timestamp) throws an error, cheat a little and use this instead: %%(condition-case nil (org-diary :scheduled :timestamp) (error nil)) Does anyone have a

[Orgmode] FR: more options in (org-diary)

2008-03-05 Thread Wanrong Lin
Hi, This is branched off from the previous thread FR: date marking in calendar. I got the marking working now with the help from Bastien. My intention was to mark calendar with important hard schedule (appointments) that can not be conflicted with. However, I could not do it with current

[Orgmode] html: handling new lines

2008-03-05 Thread lanas
Hello, Is it possible for orgmode to observe the actual newlines inserted into the org file when exporting to html ? By this I mean: - [ ] First item - [ ] Second item NOTES on the second item - [ ] Third item The 'NOTES' line, in the html version, will not have an empty line