On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Austin Frank wrote:
> As always, thanks so much for the hard work! And also to John!
>
> On Sun, Oct 05 2008, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> New attachment system
>> -
>>
>> You can now attach files to each node in the outline
Hey org-folk--
I originally included this in my questions to John and Carsten about the
new attach system, but decided it deserved its own thread. Apologies if
this seems like too much git-spam.
Now that org and git are starting to be used in conjunction by more and
more of us, would anyone else
As always, thanks so much for the hard work! And also to John!
On Sun, Oct 05 2008, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> New attachment system
> -
>
> You can now attach files to each node in the outline tree. This
> works by creating special directories based on the ID of an en
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Manish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, William Henney wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> >> Maybe a caching problem?
> >>
> >
> > Maybe. But caching where?
> >
> > -
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, William Henney wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> Maybe a caching problem?
>>
>
> Maybe. But caching where?
>
> --
> $ curl -s http://orgmode.org/org.tar.gz
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe a caching problem?
>
Maybe. But caching where?
--
$ curl -s http://orgmode.org/org.tar.gz | tar tzf - | head -1
org-6.07b/
---
Hi Carsten
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am releasing Org version 6.08. The biggest news is the integration of
> John Wiegley's attachment system that allows to keep a directory with file
> attachments for each entry. Great stuff.
>
> As
Hi,
I noticed a bug with org-bbdb. If I enter a anniversary for the 1st of
March, org doesn't show it in the agenda and complains with "Bad sexp at
line 9 in /home/sec/org/geburtstage.org: (org-bbdb-anniversaries)"
It seems to have to do with the special-casing of the 29th of February
in leap-yea
Hello All,
I have set a "#+FILETAGS: :Personal:" in my org file (did a C-c C-c
to initilalize it.) The tag did not appear in the agenda view like I
expected it to. I was hoping to use agenda view filtering on tags to
see a subset of tasks with that tag (without having to set that for
all tasks
On Oct 5, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Womick, Don wrote:
Carsten, thanks. That makes sense, once you know about it.
I don’t think this behavior is documented. Can you add it the
manual? Might prevent a stupid question or two… J
Sure, it is now a footnote to the documentation of C-c '
- Carsten
Carsten, thanks. That makes sense, once you know about it.
I don't think this behavior is documented. Can you add it the manual?
Might prevent a stupid question or two... :-)
Regards,
Don
From: Carsten Dominik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Carste
Hi Don,
this is on purpose. Putting a comma in front of such lines makes sure
Org does not consider them as special, for example when searching for
in-buffer options like #+STARTUP. The same thing happens for lines
startin with a star, which Org could mistake for an outline heading.
The p
After running C-c ' (apostrophe) on a shell script between #+BEGIN_SRC
and #+END_SRC tags and returning to the org file using C-c ' again,
comments in the script have a , (comma) prepended.
If I have
#+BEGIN_SRC shell-script
#! /bin/bash
# some comments here... they'll be preceded by comm
Please excuse the duplication if this comes across twice... I posted it an
hour or so ago from my work email address and I haven't seen it yet.
After running C-c ' (apostrophe) on a shell script between #+BEGIN_SRC and
#+END_SRC tags and returning to the org file using C-c ' again, comments in
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
