> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Rose writes:
Sebastian> I highly apreciate the support of Docbook and your
Sebastian> effort. Yet, I think I don't want to publish XHTML through
Sebastian> Docbook.
+1
I gave up on DocBook long ago. It's pain to author documents in it and
the tools are quite wea
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Ian Barton wrote:
> I have been working on an article on syncing org files using a version
> control system for a while. The recent posts about using a usb stick
> motivated me to try and finish it.
>
> You can see the html version at
> http://www.ian-barton.com/ian-barton
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Nobody else has commented on this, so perhaps I am doing something
wrong.
My recollection is that [setting the todo state of a task with a
repeating scheduled task to done] did not used to insert a closed
timestamp, but now it seems to -- or at
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Daniel Clemente writes:
In fact I would like to use often the agenda view with several
tags excluded, so the ideal setup would be an agenda custom search.
But I don't know which command
Daniel:
The package you had available on your site was just the ticket for
installing org-annotation-helper. It solved some problems. It worked out
of the box.
I am unable to get a copy on the work site due to an absurd firewall, so I
tried to install it from the copy in the contrib directory.
Hi again,
Sorry for the multiple messages.
I just noticed one other thing. When I go from slide mode to plain mode,
the full table of contents will not be displayed unless I reload the page.
Scott Randby
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember:
Hi again,
I just noticed that the title is displayed when I hit "x" to view the
page as slides and it appears at the top of every slide. Unfortunately,
I don't want the title displayed when viewing the page as slides. I only
want it displayed above the table of contents when in plain or info m
Hi,
I just upgraded org-info.js to version 0.1.0.2. Everything works fine
except for one item.
The org file I use to generate my web page contains the line
#+TITLE: This is the Title
which org-mode 6.23 exports to html, right below , as
This is the Title
When I view the web page using
Thanks, Mike. That was it. For some reason I had, on the
Vista machine, an old version (3.15) of org.el earlier in
the load-path than on the XP machine. I really don't know
where it came from... :(
Mark
* Mike Newman wrote (on 3/3/2009 3:26 PM):
I would check that you are running the same ve
Also try locate-library.
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early;
Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering, pain, and disability (worse
than nearly all other serious diseases studied; Schweitzer et al.
1995) and grossly corrupting science. The denialism is worse tha
I would check that you are running the same version of org on both -
call the function org-version.
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:39:52 -0800
Mark Elston wrote:
> I have two machines: WinXP and Vista (64 bit) with Emacs 22.3
> on both.
>
> Both are configured the same in terms of libraries and, speci
Dale Smith writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> The LaTeX and XHTML export (which, by the
>> way, could be transformed just as good as docbook) work and are widely
>> used.
>
> I'm not sure sure. I think docbook is much more content oriented than
> LaTeX and xhtml, which seem to be more presen
Sebastian Rose writes:
> The LaTeX and XHTML export (which, by the
> way, could be transformed just as good as docbook) work and are widely
> used.
I'm not sure sure. I think docbook is much more content oriented than
LaTeX and xhtml, which seem to be more presentation oriented. To
me anyway.
I have two machines: WinXP and Vista (64 bit) with Emacs 22.3
on both.
Both are configured the same in terms of libraries and, specifically,
the org-mode configuration is the same.
However, the (require 'org-install) on the Vista system doesn't
seem to work the same as it does on WinXP. When I
Sebastian Rose writes:
>> I have not tried it, but it seems that syntax highlighting of source
>> code listing can be done. See this page:
>>
>> http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SyntaxHighlighting.html
>
>
> Does this know about the fonts and colors I use in Emacs? htmlize.el
> does.
I don
Hey all,
To reproduce:
* TODO Make Bicycle :project:workshop:
** TODO Buy stuff
** TODO Build stuff
** TODO Test stuff
(setq org-use-tag-inheritance t)
(setq org-tags-exclude-from-inheritance '("project"))
to type in a match string to search, I type in "project"
I expected to see:
TODO Make B
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>
>> I think we would find hundreds of xslt stylesheets on the web to
>> transform Docbook to virtually any format.
>
> Yes, this is the power and beauty of DocBook.
>
>> Will we loose the features of htmlize.el?
>> I'm not familiar with the Docbook D
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> docbook is great since it's widely used.
>
> Yes, DocBook has been adopted by many organizations in different areas
> in the past years. Once we have a good exporter for DocBook, we
> basically build a bridge for exporting Org files to all other
Sebastian Rose writes:
>
> I think we would find hundreds of xslt stylesheets on the web to
> transform Docbook to virtually any format.
Yes, this is the power and beauty of DocBook.
> Will we loose the features of htmlize.el?
> I'm not familiar with the Docbook DTD - I know it includes lots of
Sebastian Rose writes:
> docbook is great since it's widely used.
Yes, DocBook has been adopted by many organizations in different areas
in the past years. Once we have a good exporter for DocBook, we
basically build a bridge for exporting Org files to all other formats.
> The output looks go
Hi,
Sebastian> Anyway, I'd prefere to export to _one_ XML format from
Sebastian> Org-mode and provide xslt stylesheets to translate between
Sebastian> different formats.
Sebastian> That way we all would concentrate on one XML exporter (e.g.
Sebastian> the XHTML exporter) and could provide xslt st
Dale Smith writes:
> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
>> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is
>> the exporter for DocBook format.
>
> There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse formats. I've
> found that I can edit .muse files in org-mode and stiil publish to
Just a note. Be careful of the use of colors. For example,
you have quoted strings in yellow in section 3.3. This color
makes the strings almost invisible on my screen. This makes
it hard to read.
Also, is there a single-page or pdf version of this material?
Mark
* Ian Barton wrote (on 3/3/
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Anyway, I'd prefere to export to _one_ XML format from Org-mode and
> provide xslt stylesheets to translate between different formats.
>
> That way we all would concentrate on one XML exporter (e.g. the XHTML
> exporter) and could provide xslt stylesheets to transform the
docbook is great since it's widely used.
The output looks good!
How could we test it?
And could we configure it somehow?
Anyway, I'd prefere to export to _one_ XML format from Org-mode and
provide xslt stylesheets to translate between different formats.
That way we all would concentrate on
> For this you would indeed you a skip function.
>
> E.g.,
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (setq org-agenda-custom-commands
> '(("A" agenda ""
>((org-agenda-skip-function '(org-agenda-skip-entry-if 'regexp
> ":TAG:"))
> --8<---
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is
> the exporter for DocBook format.
There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse formats. I've
found that I can edit .muse files in org-mode and stiil publish to
docbook.
> During the last we
I have been working on an article on syncing org files using a version
control system for a while. The recent posts about using a usb stick
motivated me to try and finish it.
You can see the html version at
http://www.ian-barton.com/ian-barton/org_vcs/org_vcs.html and get the
current version
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:05 PM, Matthew Lundin wrote:
Daniel Clemente writes:
In fact I would like to use often the agenda view with several
tags excluded, so the ideal setup would be an agenda custom search.
But I don't know which command to use in org-agenda-custom-
commands: I don't want
Daniel Clemente writes:
> In fact I would like to use often the agenda view with several tags
> excluded, so the ideal setup would be an agenda custom search.
> But I don't know which command to use in org-agenda-custom-commands: I
> don't want tags-todo (that's a heading list), but the re
Carsten Dominik writes:
> This looks interesting. Do you have application examples?
Only the one I mentioned in the original message so far. It just wraps
the hole page into a table like this:
++
| Title |
+-+--+
| toc | sections.. |
Just in case you missed the recent changes:
Org-mode > 6.23 (commit a68eb4b1e64cbe6e495fdd2c1eaf8ae597bf8602)
introduces a new HTML container, that wraps everything inside
`'. That container has the ID `content' applied.
NOTE:
* YOU'LL HAVE TO UPGRADE org-info.js too, if you us
> Assign a FLUFF tag to your tasks then run the agenda normally and remove
> the fluff with
>
> / - TAB FLUFF RET
Thanks, this works. I will use tags instead of categories.
>
> or if you do that often set up org-tags-alist with F for FLUFF and just
>
> / - F
>
In fact I would like to use of
OK. An updated version of org-info.js in now available on github as
well, as in worg.git.
NOTE: you MUST UPDATE ORG-INFO.JS, if you use the current git version.
The changes to org-info.js are backward compatible.
Hence you don't need to re-export everything.
Regards,
Sebastian
Carsten Domi
This looks interesting. Do you have application examples?
A more template-like structure would be an alist, with contexts as keys,
and then two string values for the code to be inserted. Using
customize, this
could be set up by non-lispers.
- Carsten
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Sebastian
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
I have now added a "content" container around all of body.
- Carsten
OK, I'll go and adjust org-info.js as needed now.
Best,
Sebastian
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
Seb
On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
should this really be its own paragraph? I think it could be in
the creator
line.
Actually, I take that back.
I have applied your patch, b
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> should this really be its own paragraph? I think it could be in the creator
>> line.
>
> Actually, I take that back.
>
> I have applied your patch, but wrapped it into a variable
> org-expor
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I have now added a "content" container around all of body.
>
> - Carsten
OK, I'll go and adjust org-info.js as needed now.
Best,
Sebastian
>
> On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>
>>> Richard Riley writes:
Sebastian
I have now added a "content" container around all of body.
- Carsten
On Mar 3, 2009, at 2:16 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
Sebastian Rose writes:
Richard Riley writes:
Sebastian Rose writes:
Richard Riley writes:
I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently
generated
bein
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
should this really be its own paragraph? I think it could be in the
creator line.
Actually, I take that back.
I have applied your patch, but wrapped it into a variable
org-export-html-validation-link which defaults to
Hi Sebastian,
should this really be its own paragraph? I think it could be in the
creator line.
- Carsten
On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
This patch inserts a link into the postamble to validate the XHTML 1.0
via http://validator.w3.org/
By clicking on the link, t
The appended patch allows for custom layouts of the exported XHTML. As
the custom elements are added literally, PHP code could be added too.
Everyone who's informed about my elisp skills will read this with
appropriate scepticism :)
It's merely a proof of conncept, a suggestion.
Maybe we could f
[snip quoted text]
I don't understand the problem!
Samuel, please
could show us the *org* test file.?
eg:
file---
** test
his is a test[1]. it is also a test[2]. and it
has a link [google link one]. and another [3] and another
[yahoo link two].[4]
foo
On Mar 3, 2009, at 7:33 AM, Taru Karttunen wrote:
On 02.03 10:40, William Henney wrote:
Selecting only some entries to display would be possible,
but is it really necessary? In my use cases I just tend
to have a per-article bib-file that contains the entries
I wish to use. Making a rich enough
This patch inserts a link into the postamble to validate the XHTML 1.0
via http://validator.w3.org/
By clicking on the link, the page will be validated in a new browser
window (or tab).
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index 95b9ad8..b359da1 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp.el
+++ b/lisp/
Could anyone of the bibtex users here add a little 5 line tutorial on how
to use bibtex (just few lines to get me started)? I never used bibtex,
but I'd want to support it in org-info.js and therefore need to create
testfiles.
(Ignore this mail if just another section is added to the resulting
XHT
47 matches
Mail list logo
