Hi Eric,
I have fixed this issue in the definition of the variable value instead
of in the code. Bastien did define `org-export-latex-packages'
as a list of lists instead of a list of cons cells. So we should
stick with this structure - which is also better because it is
more easily extended, f
:-) This was fun, thanks!
- Carsten
On Apr 1, 2010, at 7:39 PM, Julien Barnier wrote:
Dear org-moders,
Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, could
really help to promote and transform org-mode as
How about smorgasbord-mode?
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010, Detlef Steuer wrote:
> there must be something special with today ...
> :-)
>
> nice one
>
> Detlef
>
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:39:14 +0200
> Julien Barnier wrote:
>
> > As you see, the project is already quite advanced and mature. The las
It appears that the cadr -> cdr change is also necessary in org-latex.el
(at least for Emacs 22.3).
Mark
On 4/1/2010 6:29 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
After updating to the current git head, I have to make the following
changes for latex image generation to work.
diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org
After updating to the current git head, I have to make the following
changes for latex image generation to work.
diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
index dc45871..443f881 100644
--- a/lisp/org.el
+++ b/lisp/org.el
@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ appears on the page."
;; when formatting latex fragments.
Carsten,
Thanks for this clarification. This makes the transition much
simpler than I originally thought. I can certainly remove the
common package names.
The existing org-export-latex-classes also contains the
documentclass line. That won't change, will it? I am
assuming from what you have
On Friday 02 April 2010 05:39 am, Julien Barnier wrote:
> Dear org-moders,
>
> Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
> think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, could
> really help to promote and transform org-mode as a major killer-app.
[ snip
When using the =formula syntax in the spreadsheet and tabbing to the
next cell instead of using C-u C-c =, the entire TBLFM line is
overwritten.
Thanks!
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gn
Julien Barnier writes:
[snip]
> Why restart from scratch ? Because I think that org-mode should be
> easier to install and run on different OSes.
Are there other OSes besides Emacs? You are talking about the tiny
embedded ones, aren't you?
> That's why I'm going to rewrite it in C#/Mono :
I h
Fellow Org'ers,
I adore the text spreadsheet, however there's one feature Excel
provides which I don't have in org.
I often use Excel for "lists", where I can sort or narrow the data by
specific criteria from a larger list.
Would it be feasible to "narrow" a table by criteria on a specific
field
Here's the use-case:
I'm working on Task 1, and encounter an unusual problem.
I want my clock report to show some detail about why Task 1
took more time than usual.
I don't want to create a sub-heading and clock into it then
adjust the clock, etc. I just want to store a note or create a
heading
Julien Barnier writes:
> That's why I'm going to rewrite it in C#/Mono : this will assure that
> the new project can run on every machine you can think about, and it
> would be much lighter on resources (especially memory) than Emacs.
:)
> Because Emacs keys are really to complicated and quite
Julien Barnier writes:
> Dear org-moders,
>
> Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
> think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, could
> really help to promote and transform org-mode as a major killer-app.
>
> It has been a long time since I t
Julien Barnier writes:
[...]
> Why restart from scratch ? Because I think that org-mode should be
> easier to install and run on different OSes. That's why I'm going to
> rewrite it in C#/Mono
There are some very good reasons to avoid Mono [1]. If I could
recommend another language; Clojure [2
Julien Barnier writes:
> Dear org-moders,
>
> Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
> think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, could
> really help to promote and transform org-mode as a major killer-app.
Thank goodness, the killer app is go
"Eric Schulte" writes:
[snipped 13 lines]
> Footnotes:
> [1] http://github.com/eschulte/org-html-mail
>
Presumably, you meant http://github.com/eschulte/org-mime as your link
does not work.
[snipped 18 lines]
sivaram
--
___
Emacs-orgmode mai
there must be something special with today ...
:-)
nice one
Detlef
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:39:14 +0200
Julien Barnier wrote:
> Dear org-moders,
>
> Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
> think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, coul
Dear org-moders,
Today is quite a special day for me, and for many of org-mode users I
think, because I'm going to introduce a project that, I believe, could
really help to promote and transform org-mode as a major killer-app.
It has been a long time since I think about it, but now I am going to
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using the code currently located at [1] for sending HTML email
> [2] for a little while now, and it is working very well.
>
> I wonder if this should be included in the contrib directory of
> Org-mode? Also, since it currently only supports gnus (it sho
On Apr 1, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Aloha Carsten,
Packages that aren't used for all classes can still appear in org-
export-latex-classes, correct?
Aloha Tom,
Anything can appear there. But you should not have the packages I
have listed in the new variable org-export-latex
I too am a non-programmer-type who loves emacs/org-mode. I second this
approach. I don't think it will ever be possible -- nor desirable -- to
create a pure out-of-the-box setup as in window's programs -- but this
approach would work well for those of us able to tinker and learn a
little but not qu
Aloha Carsten,
Packages that aren't used for all classes can still appear in org-
export-latex-classes, correct?
All the best,
Tom
On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
OK, this change is now in the master branch.
- Carsten
On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Johan Ekh writes:
> Hi all,
> how can I generate a timeline view that contains only tasks that have a
> certain tag attached to it?
>
> Let's say I have a project "Project 1" and I attach a tag "P1" to all TODO
> entries in this project.
> Can I generate a timeline view that contains only items
Giovanni Ridolfi writes:
> "Eric Schulte" writes:
>> peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>>> Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
>>> it. [...]
>>> On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
>>> functionality exists.
Just a suggestion from an almo
Hi all,
how can I generate a timeline view that contains only tasks that have a
certain tag attached to it?
Let's say I have a project "Project 1" and I attach a tag "P1" to all TODO
entries in this project.
Can I generate a timeline view that contains only items with the tag "P1"
attached?
BR
Jo
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>> Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
>> it. [...]
>> On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
>> functionality exists.
>>
>
> My uneducated guess is that it will [...]
> near impossi
Dan Davison writes:
[...]
>
> As I understand it the code you've written is designed to be called in a
> message-mode buffer with orgstruct-mode in force. Would it make sense to
> also include in your package a complementary function, that one calls in
> an org-mode buffer? I envisage this gener
Hi Peter,
peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>
> So, wouldn't it be good if org could send those nicely formatted
> emails using their mail clients? 'M-x org-send-email' and woosh, there
> it goes!
>
I agree this would be nice, however my initial reaction is that this
will be the sort of project whic
OK, this change is now in the master branch.
- Carsten
On Apr 1, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Mark,
OK, it seems that I have really overstated this change. You are of
course right that your header for a document type can be very long,
that that defining it in org-export-latex-
Hi Mark,
OK, it seems that I have really overstated this change. You are of
course right that your header for a document type can be very long,
that that defining it in org-export-latex-classes is a viable option
(other being to put this stuff into a separate file).
So let me restate what I am
David Maus writes:
> Eric Schulte wrote:
[...]
>>I should have been clearer here. I *am* using the multipart/alternative
>>appropriately. When a chunk of org-mode text is converted to html I am
>>adding a single multipart/alternative block with two alternatives, both
>>the plain org-mode text
On 31 Mar 2010, at 21:09, Gary wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
>
>> although many people have been saying it is
>> intimidating, it is not.
>
> Oh yes it is :)
I kind of agree. This brings up another question, related to the recent
discussion about making a 'read
32 matches
Mail list logo
