Carsten Dominik wrote:
Applied, thanks.
Thank you. Looking forward to 6.35 I am watching Changes.org and have seen a
typo which I think is worth to be pointed out:
==
--- a/ORGWEBPAGE/Changes.org
+++
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Michael Brand wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Applied, thanks.
Thank you. Looking forward to 6.35 I am watching Changes.org and
have seen a typo which I think is worth to be pointed out:
Thanks, applied. Pheuw, I will be very glad when I get this release
out
On Apr 5, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Hi,
It is now possible to send HTML mail directly form an org-mode buffer.
Calling `org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize' (could probably use a better
name)
from inside of an org-mode buffer will use `org-export-as-html' to
generate HTML of the
Hi guys, I believe I found one little thing that this patch broke. That is
linking to either a text search or heading search in a different org file.
I've attached two files which illustrate this. The first file
test.orgcontains a link to a heading search of * Hello in the other
file (
other.org).
On 05.04.2010 02:33, Luke Amdor wrote:
Hi guys, I believe I found one little thing that this patch broke. That
is linking to either a text search or heading search in a different org
file. I've attached two files which illustrate this. The first file
test.org http://test.org contains a link to
Dear all,
I need some feedback.
Here is new new section from the list of changes, about the LaTeX
setup. I would like to hear honest answers if I have gone completely
crazy, of if this actually makes any sense.
Thanks.
- Carsten
Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot for this, I think I'll use it quite a bit.
This may be specific to my setup, but in case this is useful to others,
as a gnus user I had to do
(setq mail-user-agent 'message-user-agent)
Without altering this --- i.e. with mail-user-agent set to the default
value of
Hmm, perhaps I should have been a bit more careful with protecting the
various special email constructs in my message. Second try:
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
Hi Eric,
Thanks a lot for this, I think I'll use it quite a bit.
This may be specific to my setup, but in case this
Is there a way to add org-habit to the
org-modules list without using org-custom and without
specifying all the modules at once, like this:
(setq org-modules (quote (org-bbdb org-bibtex blah blah blah)))
I'm looking for something like this:
;; Except this doesn't work :-)
(append org-modules
Nathan Neff nathan.n...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a way to add org-habit to the
org-modules list without using org-custom and without
specifying all the modules at once, like this:
(setq org-modules (quote (org-bbdb org-bibtex blah blah blah)))
I'm looking for something like this:
;;
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
On Apr 5, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Hi,
It is now possible to send HTML mail directly form an org-mode buffer.
Calling `org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize' (could probably use a better
name)
from inside of an org-mode buffer will use
It's certainly true that email clients can be particular about how they
display HTML.
One possible fix for issues like these is to use the
`org-mime-html-hook' hook and the `org-mime-change-element-style'
function for forcing inline css into the misbehaving elements.
Best -- Eric
Dan Davison
Nathan Neff nathan.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to add org-habit to the
org-modules list without using org-custom and without
specifying all the modules at once, like this:
(setq org-modules (quote (org-bbdb org-bibtex blah blah blah)))
I'm looking for something like this:
;;
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
...
It might be better to use the add-to-list function instead though
because it checks if the element is already in the list and only adds it
if it is not - not that this function *does* modify its argument so you
Bah, humbug: ^^^ This should be
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Sometimes I would like to rewrite the entire table editior for more
structural clarity in the sode, so that it would be easier to implement
more fancy stuff :-)
Possibly one of these fancy things: Some time ago I thought about transposing
a table. But only now I
Carsten,
I, for one, like this writeup. It is very clear concerning the
ins and outs of the new setup. Of course, I paid attention to all
the other discussion on this topic so I may be somewhat biased.
It only *sounds* complicated when you see it all laid out like you
have it below. It breaks
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Nathan Neff nathan.n...@gmail.com writes:
Is there a way to add org-habit to the
org-modules list without using org-custom and without
specifying all the modules at once, like this:
(setq org-modules (quote
I'm happy to report that my patches for org-mode to support linking to
notmuch mail are usable with the current master branch of notmuch (as
of a few hours ago). These have been tested for a while, but I think
only by me. I find them incredibly useful (well, I found the links to
Wanderlust very
It requires a version of notmuch from git after April 5 2010. The
code here is based on org-wl.el. One thing to note is that links to
threads are faked as a collection of message ids. This is because
notmuch thread-ids are currently not stable between dump/restore of
the database.
---
---
Makefile|1 +
lisp/org.el |3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 18b37d3..177139f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ LISPF = org.el \
org-mhe.el \
20 matches
Mail list logo
