Bernt Hansen wrote:
> > Isn't this the same as setting line-move-visual to nil? Just pretend
> > it's an org-mode option.
>
> Could be :) I didn't find any details about that var when I looked at
> the docstrings for the functions involved.
>
There's some documentation about it in the Emacs m
Nick Dokos writes:
> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>
>> "Mark S." writes:
>>
>> > Hi Bernt,
>> >
>> > Thanks for pointing that out.
>> >
>> > However, I'm not on an item line nor a header line, so those settings
>> > should not apply. But even when I changed my line to an item, and then
>> > tried the s
Bernt Hansen wrote:
> "Mark S." writes:
>
> > Hi Bernt,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that out.
> >
> > However, I'm not on an item line nor a header line, so those settings
> > should not apply. But even when I changed my line to an item, and then
> > tried the settings "t" and "reversed", it st
--- On Tue, 5/17/11, Memnon Anon wrote:
> From: Memnon Anon
> Subject: Re: [O] Ctl-E doesn't go to end of line?
> To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 7:30 PM
> Hi Mark,
>
> "Mark S."
> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > In org-mode, Ctl-E is bound to org-end-of-line.
> However
Hi Mark,
"Mark S." writes:
> Hello,
>
> In org-mode, Ctl-E is bound to org-end-of-line. However, this doesn't
> appear to take you to the actual end of line as it does in the regular
> modes. Instead, it appears to take you out to the default line fill --
> even if your specified line fill is mu
"Mark S." writes:
> Hi Bernt,
>
> Thanks for pointing that out.
>
> However, I'm not on an item line nor a header line, so those settings
> should not apply. But even when I changed my line to an item, and then
> tried the settings "t" and "reversed", it still wouldn't hop to the
> end of the lin
Hi Bernt,
Thanks for pointing that out.
However, I'm not on an item line nor a header line, so those settings should
not apply. But even when I changed my line to an item, and then tried the
settings "t" and "reversed", it still wouldn't hop to the end of the line in
one go. In fact, if the li
"Mark S." writes:
> Hello,
>
> In org-mode, Ctl-E is bound to org-end-of-line. However, this doesn't
> appear to take you to the actual end of line as it does in the regular
> modes. Instead, it appears to take you out to the default line fill --
> even if your specified line fill is much shorter
Hello,
In org-mode, Ctl-E is bound to org-end-of-line. However, this doesn't appear to
take you to the actual end of line as it does in the regular modes. Instead, it
appears to take you out to the default line fill -- even if your specified line
fill is much shorter or much longer than the def
I replaced all existing todos with lowercase equivalents and don't recall
having any downsides. I agree that it's a much more pleasant and less
intimidating visual.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:34, Nathan Neff wrote:
>
> Can anyone see foresee any big pitfalls with doing this?
>
>
I'm considering using lower-case "TODO" keywords -- I tried
them out and they're MUCH LESS INTIMITDATING than their
upper-case counterparts :-)
Can anyone see foresee any big pitfalls with doing this?
I did a dry run on a test.org file, and the agenda contained a bunch
of * DONE headings (because
You might also want to have a look at the following scripts that I wrote
lots of years ago that allow creating a booklet of an arbitrary postscript
file. They might be broken though after all these years. Please let me know
of any problems. See:
http://imagic.weizmann.ac.il/~dov/freesw/impose+/ind
suvayu ali gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Luke Crook balooga.com> wrote:
> > :NOEXPORT: removes a heading from export and the TOC. Is there a
> > tag that will
> > only exclude a heading from appearing in the TOC?
> >
>
> For LaTeX export the following header option sh
amscopub-m...@yahoo.com wrote:
> How can I get org-mode to stop inserting the default CSS in the HTML export?
>
> By default, exporting to HTML gives me this CSS defined in the header. I'd
> like to...well, *not* have it included in the HTML.
>
Does footnote (2) of section 12.5.9, "CSS suppor
Julien Danjou writes:
>> Is it possible to specify birthdays without year? I often want to jot
>> down someone's birthday so I'm not surprised next year, but don't want
>> to ask them how old they are. :)
>
> Not really :(
Same problem here, I just set the year to 1900 whenever I do not know.
How can I get org-mode to stop inserting the default CSS in the HTML export?
By default, exporting to HTML gives me this CSS defined in the header. I'd like
to...well, *not* have it included in the HTML.