Myles English writes:
> Hello {Jambunathan},
>
> I have found that Equations become labelled as Figures in the version I
> am using:
>
> emacs 23.3.1
> org-mode from git commit 71f1c1be (Oct 26)
> The test equations in latex-mathml.org in this message:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-
Nick Dokos writes:
> [I hope you'll forgive me the off-topic ruminations]
>
> Jambunathan K wrote:
>
>> If you do a
>>
>> C-h C-\ RET tamil-itrans RET
>>
>> you will see a nicely aligned table which gives translation table for
>> tamil characters - (OK, Tamil is the language I speak) - which
On 30.10.2011, at 10:04, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> - This patch covers only one of many ways to make unwanted changes
>> in an invisible area. Others would be delete, backspace,
>> kill-region, yank, kill-line, and an arbitrarily long list of
>> less obv
Hi Achim
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:33, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> In case the errors are confirmed: My guess is that again you have a
>> better solution than me and I don't propose a patch yet. (org-version)
>> uses (file-exists-p (expand-file-name ".git" dir)) and
>> (executable-find "git") for this
Hi Achim
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:01, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Why should the git-describe info not be part of the ELPA tarball? If
> there is a good reason not to include it (I think it is useful
> to know which commit the ELPA archive was built on) one could alter the
> include file before rolli
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> - This patch covers only one of many ways to make unwanted changes
> in an invisible area. Others would be delete, backspace,
> kill-region, yank, kill-line, and an arbitrarily long list of
> less obvious other commands. Full protection could only be
Hi Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali writes:
> That said, the problem I am facing is org-export-with-tags evaluates to
> not-in-toc irrespective of what is set by the tags: option (see for
> example the test file earlier in the thread). So effectively the test
> is not checking what it is supposed to check. So
Hi Nick,
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:07:27 -0400
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > In the attached patch, I use the variable org-export-with-tags to
> > check whether tags should be included or skipped in the export
> > title. However irrespective of the export options I get the value
> >
On 30.10.2011, at 08:30, Jambunathan K wrote:
>
>> - This patch covers only one of many ways to make unwanted changes
>> in an invisible area. Others would be delete, backspace,
>> kill-region, yank, kill-line, and an arbitrarily long list of
>> less obvious other commands. Full protection
Michael Brand writes:
> I have looked into your branch only now. I think it is uncommon for
> Makefiles how clean they look now and I appreciate how the Makefile
> has been split up plus one is in doc/ and one in lisp/, that there are
> no explicit xy.el any more and so on. Thank you for this work
> - This patch covers only one of many ways to make unwanted changes
> in an invisible area. Others would be delete, backspace,
> kill-region, yank, kill-line, and an arbitrarily long list of
> less obvious other commands. Full protection could only be
> done with pre-change-hooks or so,
Michael Brand writes:
> Is it possible with your current "make info" to get an info file
> without git describe for a release like ELPA when made from within a
> git repo
Why should the git-describe info not be part of the ELPA tarball? If
there is a good reason not to include it (I think it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
