Re: [O] if we operate on a subtree, perhaps we could adjust levels

Samuel Wales writes: > you will notice that the decrypted subtree is actually at a higher > level than its parent. this is a violation of org structure. > > in consequence, it can silently swallow the entire rest of the file. > > this is not desired. > > is there a way to fix it? There's two ways

Re: [O] (require 'org-publish) causes downgrade in org-version

psycho_punch writes: > I have just upgraded org-mode to the latest available in ELPA. > According to the official documentation, the installation has to be > done in fresh emacs session where no org-related scripts/files have > been loaded. The installation is successful, and org-version reports >

[O] babel setup

Hi all, I am using Emacs 24.3.9 + org-mode 8.2.6(from ELPA) I followed this instruction http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages.html#configure and added the following to my .emacs file. (org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages '((python . t) (emacs-li

Re: [O] if we operate on a subtree, perhaps we could adjust levels

hi bastien, On 4/17/14, Bastien wrote: > Then I didn't understand what you suggested. Can you restate > it again? Thanks, will try. On 3/26/14, Samuel Wales wrote: > in maint, if you encrypt with org-crypt on an entry with children, then > demote, then decrypt, the subtree levels do not matc

Re: [O] Is

Grant Rettke writes: > Hi, > > When I type > > > it is expanded into > > #+BEGIN_SRC > > #+END_SRC > > Is supposed to expand into upper case letters? > > For some reason, my system won't tangle blocks that are all upper > case, instead only all lower case is tangled. > All the discussion has be

Re: [O] Bug: Italics support fails after non-breaking space [8.2.6 (8.2.6-67-g9e09b2-elpa @ /home/crculver/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140602/)]

Christopher Culver writes: > Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and > what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See > > http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback > > Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.

[O] org version check on start

Good afternoon, Yesterday I was fiddling with getting tangling working in a Makefile. My humanity caught up with me and I wasn't super vigilant about the order of my command line arguments to Emacs. Basically, I asked it to do some work before the correct version of org-mode was loaded. Now, Emacs

Re: [O] How to create non-inheritable properties?

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Charles Berry wrote: > Just guessing at this, but ... > > I suspect Grant's file has noweb chunks and that > `org-babel-use-quick-and-dirty-noweb-expansion' is set to nil. Exactly. Have been using it quite extensively. > If the :noweb-ref feature is not used, sett

Re: [O] How to create non-inheritable properties?

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > I don't know *how* big your file is, but instead of waiting 8 min for > tangling you could as well install outshine.el and outorg.el and then > use > > ,--- > | M-: outorg-convert-org-to-outshine > `--

Re: [O] Is

On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Thats of course much cooler than the pedestrian version. Only downside > might be if you search your init file for #+begin_src or so one day > because your forgot about org-structure-template-alist you won't find it > ;) Cool had nothing to

Re: [O] set TO as a property on a heading

Yes! That (C-j) is exactly what does it. and it is ido enabled. Thanks, it was driving me crazy! Rasmus writes: > John Kitchin writes: > >> I feel a little silly asking this, but I cannot figure out how to do >> it. I want to create a property called TO. >> >> Normally I type C-c C-x p to set

Re: [O] set TO as a property on a heading

Aaron Ecay writes: Interesting! Thanks for the tip. > Hi John, > > You can use C-c C-x P (with a capital 'p') to enter both the property > name and value in a free text prompt (no completion). In your case, > you'd enter "TO: " followed by your desired value. > > Aaron > -- ---

[O] (require 'org-publish) causes downgrade in org-version

I have posted this question on StackOverflow but in case you don't want to visit the page, I've pasted the contents in this email. I have just upgraded org-mode to the latest available in ELP

[O] Bug: Italics support fails after non-breaking space [8.2.6 (8.2.6-67-g9e09b2-elpa @ /home/crculver/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20140602/)]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.

Re: [O] babel C, C++, D enhancement

Thierry Banel writes: > Hi Eric, hi All > > Here is a new patch (do not apply the previous). > I added a check in the test suite for the D compiler availability > (and for the C++ compiler as well). > It silently returns true when the compiler is not found. > > To run the test suite I did that: >

Re: [O] set TO as a property on a heading

Hi John, You can use C-c C-x P (with a capital 'p') to enter both the property name and value in a free text prompt (no completion). In your case, you'd enter "TO: " followed by your desired value. Aaron

Re: [O] set TO as a property on a heading

John Kitchin writes: > I feel a little silly asking this, but I cannot figure out how to do > it. I want to create a property called TO. > > Normally I type C-c C-x p to set a property. When I type TO, the > minibuffer tries to autocomplete to many things other than TO, and I > cannot figure out

[O] set TO as a property on a heading

I feel a little silly asking this, but I cannot figure out how to do it. I want to create a property called TO. Normally I type C-c C-x p to set a property. When I type TO, the minibuffer tries to autocomplete to many things other than TO, and I cannot figure out how to cancel the rest and use TO

Re: [O] How to create non-inheritable properties?

Thorsten Jolitz gmail.com> writes: > > Grant Rettke wisdomandwonder.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > My org file has a lot of text in it. It really needs to be in the same > > file though, so it is a big file. > > > > When I org-babel-tangle, I would like to speed it up as it takes 8 minutes. >

Re: [O] Is

Grant Rettke writes: > Just added this to my init file to do that work: > > (mapc (lambda (asc) > (let ((org-sce-dc (downcase (nth 1 asc > (setf (nth 1 asc) org-sce-dc))) > org-structure-template-alist) Thats of course much cooler than the pedestrian version. Only dow

Re: [O] How to create non-inheritable properties?

Grant Rettke writes: > Hi, > > My org file has a lot of text in it. It really needs to be in the same > file though, so it is a big file. > > When I org-babel-tangle, I would like to speed it up as it takes 8 minutes. 8 minutes? wow ... when I convert my former big init.el with 7272 lines to or

Re: [O] babel C, C++, D enhancement

Hi Eric, hi All Here is a new patch (do not apply the previous). I added a check in the test suite for the D compiler availability (and for the C++ compiler as well). It silently returns true when the compiler is not found. To run the test suite I did that: - start from an up-to-date org-mode/ GI

Re: [O] Is

Just added this to my init file to do that work: (mapc (lambda (asc) (let ((org-sce-dc (downcase (nth 1 asc (setf (nth 1 asc) org-sce-dc))) org-structure-template-alist) Grant Rettke | AAAS, ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM, Sigma Xi g...@wisdomandwonder.com | http://www.wisdo

Re: [O] Can this table formula be done more efficient

Nick Dokos writes: > Cecil Westerhof writes: > >> At the moment I am using the following formula: >>     #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) :: >> @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4) >> >> This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improve

Re: [O] Can this table formula be done more efficient

Cecil Westerhof writes: > At the moment I am using the following formula: >     #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) :: > @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4) > > This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved. > > - The second, third a

[O] Can this table formula be done more efficient

At the moment I am using the following formula: #+TBLFM: @<<$4..@>>$4 = $2 - $3 :: @>$2=vsum(@<<$2..@>>$2) :: @>$3=vsum(@<<$3..@>>$3) :: @>$4=vsum(@<<$4..@>>$4) This does what I want, but there are two things that could be improved. - The second, third and fourth formula do exactly the same,