My more detailed configuration is below.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.7)
of 2015-01-17 on bisson
Package: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @
/usr/share/emacs/24.4/lisp/org/)
current state:
==
(setq
org-tab-first-hook '(org-hide-block
Hi Nicolas,
I just want to say thanks for continuing the conversation, by the way:
I know this thread has gotten long, but I'm glad people are still
paying attention, and Nicolas, your opinion counts for a lot.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> What about the following se
For a different approach, you could make this kind of an emacs script. I
have not done this too often, and it can be tricky to setup and debug.
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :tangle export-org-section :shebang #!/bin/sh
:;exec emacs -batch -l ~/Dropbox/kitchingroup/jmax/init.el -l "$0" "$@"
;; usage: e
Richard Lawrence writes:
>> Since full citations can only exist in a bracketed citation, there is no
>> reason to create a third object type for the latter. It acts as a mere
>> container only useful for lexer.
>
> I think this is not quite right: in my original terminology, `individual
> citatio
Hello,
Alan Schmitt writes:
> Here is a new version of the patch, with some tests and a mention in
> ORG-NEWS.
Applied. Thank you.
I slightly modified the regexp used for the match (mainly removing
unnecessary match groups).
> I did not know if I should mention the ORG-NEWS change in the
> Ch
Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> - re-produce with:
> 1. ~C-c a m~
> 2. +SCHEDULED>"<+2d>" (or similar)
>
> - I get:
> : org-element-paragraph-parser: Invalid search bound (wrong side of point)
>
>
> How do I debug this issue without bi-secting all my Org-mode files?
Try M-x toggle-debug-on-error
Hello,
Yuri D Lensky writes:
> An example to test this problem:
>
> Evaluate:
> (setq org-agenda-custom-commands
> '(("t" "TEST" tags-todo "tag"
> ((org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(deadline-up))
> then run the view. It will not be sorted properly before the patch,
> but will be
Hello,
Scott Campbell writes:
> Solved it.
>
> In org-wikinodes.el, change L328 from:
>
> (let ((m (member '(org-activate-plain-links) org-font-lock-extra-
> keywords)))
>
> to:
>
> (let ((m (member '(org-activate-plain-links (0 'org-link t)) org-font-
> lock-extra-keywords)))
>
> to account
An example to test this problem:
Evaluate:
(setq org-agenda-custom-commands
'(("t" "TEST" tags-todo "tag"
((org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(deadline-up))
then run the view. It will not be sorted properly before the patch, but will be
after.
I would also recommend factoring the c
Rasmus writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> I introduced \nbsp at some point, but there were complaints from users
>> not prettifying entities. So I guess \star is not an option either.
>
> Don't worry I use \nbsp sometimes!
> For what reason do people not want to use entities? Speed?
Becaus
Hi there,
as a long-time user of one of the spaced repetition systems, I decided
to (finally) give org-drill a try. I want to enhance my English
vocabulary with it. Do you have any suggestions as far as (1) the
structuring of the drill file and (2) speeding up the entering words in the
database
On 2015-02-03, at 06:45, Basile (The Flammable Project)
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You should have a look at EMMS. It's suite easy to setup on linux. But if
> you are using a MS Windows OS, it does requiert more settings. But
> everything you light ne controlable within Emacs.
FWIW, here's my config
Charles Berry writes:
> Rainer M Krug krugs.de> writes:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> when exporting the fillowing org file, I get an endless loop of
>> evaluations.
>>
>> This happens with only orgmode and languages enabled
>>
>> ,
>> | GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0, Carbon Version
Rasmus writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> I was wondering - is there any news on including synctex support into
>> org?
>
> No news.
Pity.
>
>> I found the thread
>>
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/69454
>>
>> but it seems that it has not been included after that?
>
> Correc
I've started using Google Code Prettify on my blog and needed to add better
support in the exports I'm getting out of org-mode. In particular, on my block
prettify seems to do a poor job of guessing the language; so I've edited
org-html-src-block to add the prettify tags (which are similar to th
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I introduced \nbsp at some point, but there were complaints from users
> not prettifying entities. So I guess \star is not an option either.
Don't worry I use \nbsp sometimes!
For what reason do people not want to use entities? Speed?
Perhaps we could make it easier t
Rasmus writes:
> Maybe ~***~. But it has side-effects of course. Using \star in place
> of * is another easy possibility.
I introduced \nbsp at some point, but there were complaints from users
not prettifying entities. So I guess \star is not an option either.
I have no opinion about ~***~.
Lele Gaifax writes:
> What about having an option to use alternative chars, maybe some fancy
> Unicode glyph? "→", "⇒", "⦿", or even some kind of non-breakable-space come to
> mind.
Alternative chars doesn't solve the problem with the default one. Also,
we try to keep Org syntax ASCII compatible
Hello,
Here is a new version of the patch, with some tests and a mention in
ORG-NEWS. I did not know if I should mention the ORG-NEWS change in the
Changelog (I did not).
Best,
Alan
From ea6fb4d8134b1708ae195a342b41de268453b470 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Schmitt
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014
I use the excellent org-mode contacts module[1] for auto-completion of
addresses in my messages. Now I'm starting to play around with
autocomplete-ispell and would like to use it in message mode, but I find it
overrides the suggestions for my address fields. Does anyone know a way around
this,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Maybe "* * *" instead of "***"? Any better idea?
Maybe ~***~. But it has side-effects of course. Using \star in place
of * is another easy possibility.
—Rasmus
--
I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> This is a silly bug actually: *...* is for bold markup, so *** is
> exported as a bold star.
Oh, I see, thank you!
> I'd rather not make an exception and modify bold parsing, so other
> characters should be inserted to represent headline's level. I find
> numbers too v
22 matches
Mail list logo
