Here is a patch with that addition to ORG-NEWS.
From 18d0d67f7f0efd635351056c185b46e2c2a54d5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Don March
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 02:39:58 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ORG-NEWS: document last "++" repeater change
---
etc/ORG-NEWS | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+
If there is no urgency I will take a shot at it next week. I will look through
the code and come up with a detailed plan that expands on your 4 steps below
and be in touch about it. Thanks in advance for your patience 😉.
On July 1, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
John Kitchin writes:
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> Maybe a defcustom consisting of an alist of anonymous faces:
>
> '((R ((:background "red")))
> (emacs-lisp ((:background "blue"
Sounds good, even if a string as the key might be better (languages are
stored as strings in the parse tree). Also why limit ourselves to
John Kitchin writes:
> I agree, it doesn't make sense to use it for customization. OTOH, it
> also adds the link type to org-link-types, rebuilds the regexp and the
> org-link-protocols.
It is possible to rebuild regexps upon modifying a defcustom.
> Do you think we would eliminate `org-link-ty
+1 for all this.
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> John Kitchin writes:
>
>> Indeed, I based this approach off a patch Rasmus posted some time ago for
>> colored blocks ;)
>>
>> It is also similar to some other approaches in org-mode, e.g.
>> the "org-%s-complete-link" functions.
>
> This is
Don March writes:
> No problem. Would you put that in "new features" or "miscellaneous"?
I'd say "miscellaneous" since this is a minor change.
Regards,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Would you mind providing a note about this change in ORG-NEWS?
No problem. Would you put that in "new features" or "miscellaneous"?
Hi,
my goal is to create a custom source block to create concept maps. The source
block contains
my custom made pseudo code. When exporting the org-file to LaTeX and PDF this
pseudo code
must be translated to DOT code. This DOT code is interpreted by the dot2texi
package.
The reason for the ps
John Kitchin writes:
> I forgot a little piece in the last patch. This one is probably right.
Thank you. Some comments follow.
> +(defcustom org-link-display-parameters nil
> + "An alist of properties to display a link with.
An alist between link types and properties to ...
> +The first ele
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> Indeed, I based this approach off a patch Rasmus posted some time ago for
> colored blocks ;)
>
> It is also similar to some other approaches in org-mode, e.g.
> the "org-%s-complete-link" functions.
This is yet another obscure part of Org, IMO. I really think we n
Hello,
"Vladimir Alexiev" writes:
> So my request is: the HTML export should have an option
> org-export-anchors-use-title
> to generate section anchors from the section title.
I disagree. Using headline is brittle since it is relatively common for
some headlines to share the same title, and
I eventually stumbled on the solution to my problem:
I restructured my document removing the #+BIBLIOGRAPHY: bib-file style
statement which no longer seems to work, placing the LateX commands to specify
the bibliography at the end of the file:
#+LATEX_CLASS: article
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage[
I have attached a patch to allow org-link-display-parameters (introduced
in a previous patch for custom faces) to also provide a custom tooltip.
It can be a string or a function, and if neither the old behavior is
used.
WDYT?
--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical En
Consider e.g. http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/Multisensor/#sec-3-2-2, which
uses an anchor made from the section number.
I much prefer a readable/meaningful anchor like github does:
https://github.com/VladimirAlexiev/VladimirAlexiev.github.io/tree/master/Mul
tisensor#322-normalization-problems
Nu
How many indexes can you have in an org-mode document exported to latex?
My experience shows 2! So how can I have 3, or more please?
This is the relevant part, I think, of my preamble of my file -
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+latex_header: \usepackage{imake
Hello,
Don March writes:
> You're right about both things. I updated the patch, and also added an
> example to the manual. If that's not what you had it mind, let me know
> or feel free to edit.
Thank you.
I used (not (time-less-p (current-time) time)) as suggested instead, so
as to take in
Hello,
Konstantin Kliakhandler writes:
> Attached is the patch, as requested.
Applied. Thank you.
> I'm not sure what were the conclusions of the side discussion, but
> I do want to point out that my change is in accordance with unicode
> symbol names and with the symbols that pdflatex prints
17 matches
Mail list logo
