Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

There must be something more than this. I sometimes work on a similar size file on an HP Chromebook using emacs in a Crouton installation and have no problems at all with speed. It is a nox emacs installation, if that matters. Alan On 11 July 2016 at 08:34, John Kitchin

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

I find it sometimes helpful to narrow to a section in large documents. On July 10, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Leo Noordhuizen wrote: Yes. You obviously have ample resources in that area! Op zo 10 jul. 2016 21:05 schreef Sharon Kimble : Leo

Re: [O] Dynamic links

It kind of sounds like you want the button-lock package. See http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/03/18/Clickable-links-for-Twitter-handles-in-Emacs/ for example (and search "clickable text" on my blog for other examples). Maybe something like: #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp (require

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

Yes. You obviously have ample resources in that area! Op zo 10 jul. 2016 21:05 schreef Sharon Kimble : > Leo Noordhuizen writes: > > > Maybe an (too ?) obvious suggestion: Get more memory ? > > I'm working on a computer with 16g of ram and

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

Leo Noordhuizen writes: > Maybe an (too ?) obvious suggestion: Get more memory ? I'm working on a computer with 16g of ram and 31g of swap, which would be adequate for almost anything I think. At the moment getting more ram isn't a viable option, I have to stick with

Re: [O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

Maybe an (too ?) obvious suggestion: Get more memory ? On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 at 16:37 Sharon Kimble wrote: > > I'm working on an org-mode file about cancer which is 945.1kb, is > converted to a tex file of 1.0mb and a pdf of 2.0mb with 505 pages. The > conversion is

Re: [O] Babel trims leading 0s for certain numbers of tables

On 2016-07-10 at 16:50, Charles C. Berry wrote: > For the latter, send the output to a file. Maybe use :file or pipe it > from your script. I'm now capturing results to :file. This also make the code less dependent on Org. I still manage all the code in Org Babel blocks, but

Re: [O] Babel trims leading 0s for certain numbers of tables

On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, Ken Mankoff wrote: I've just discovered that when Org results are returned in a table, they are modified in that leading 0s are removed. Is this a feature? A bug? Take your choice. The feature/bug happens deep down: - org-babel-execute-src-block -

Re: [O] Bug: Table formula does not copy time interval correctly [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ /usr/share/emacs/25.0.94/lisp/org/)]

Hi Rares On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Rares Vernica wrote: > Just to clarify, how would you fix this: > > | [2016-07-05 Tue]--[2016-07-06 Wed] | 1d | vsum(d) | > | [2016-07-06 Wed]--[2016-07-07 Thu] | 1d | 2 d | > #+TBLFM: $3=vsum(@1$-1..@0$-1) > > Notice the

[O] how to speed up an org-mode file?

I'm working on an org-mode file about cancer which is 945.1kb, is converted to a tex file of 1.0mb and a pdf of 2.0mb with 505 pages. The conversion is done through this code snippet '(global-set-key (kbd "s-#") 'org-latex-export-to-latex)'. There is no problem with the conversion to tex or

Re: [O] Babel trims leading 0s for certain numbers of tables

On 2016-07-10 at 13:18, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Ken Mankoff writes: > >> I've just discovered that when Org results are returned in a table, >> they are modified in that leading 0s are removed. Is this a feature? A >> bug? Is there a workaround for

Re: [O] Babel trims leading 0s for certain numbers of tables

Ken Mankoff writes: > I've just discovered that when Org results are returned in a table, > they are modified in that leading 0s are removed. Is this a feature? A > bug? Is there a workaround for this? Leading 0s are not removed if the > result is a string, but in many cases a

[O] Babel trims leading 0s for certain numbers of tables

I've just discovered that when Org results are returned in a table, they are modified in that leading 0s are removed. Is this a feature? A bug? Is there a workaround for this? Leading 0s are not removed if the result is a string, but in many cases a string of numbers is still a string and