Re: [O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

Hello Ian, I just read the docs and I like it so far. There are three things I’d mention: • Some finders have missing documentation (although their names are pretty straightforward) • Why the “new language”, why can’t it be lisp, or at least more lispish? • You gave us a possibility to create

[O] RFC: Extensible Dependencies 'N' Actions

I've been working on something akin to org-depend.el called org-edna. Basically, Edna provides an extensible means of specifying blocking conditions and trigger actions. For example, Edna allows you to specify that a task should be blocked until all TODOs have been addressed in source code: *

Re: [O] Export in Foswiki format?

"Loris Bennett" writes: > "Loris Bennett" writes: > >> "Loris Bennett" writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm interested in exporting from Org to Foswiki format. Is >>> org-export-generic.el still the way to go or has

Re: [O] Bug: export does not ignore #+INCLUDE if archived or tagged :noexport: Package: Org mode version 9.0.5 (9.0.5-elpaplus @ ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20170210/)

Stefan Kredler writes: > when archiving sections or exclude them from export I would expect > them being exempt from being evaluated during export. > The section archived or marked as ~:no export:~ is still evaluated and there > is an error > if the reference in the include

Re: [O] Export in Foswiki format?

"Loris Bennett" writes: > "Loris Bennett" writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm interested in exporting from Org to Foswiki format. Is >> org-export-generic.el still the way to go or has this been superseded by >> something else? > > Nevermind, I

Re: [O] Bug: Canceling a TODO state change does not revert the heading [9.0.5 (9.0.5-elpa @ /home/laurence/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20170210/)]

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I disagree. You may want to cancel the message because this change > doesn't require one, but, yet, want the todo state change. I see, that makes sense. I notice that supplying an empty message with C-c C-k results in no logbook entry at all. Is that intended behaviour

[O] Bug: export does not ignore #+INCLUDE if archived or tagged :noexport: Package: Org mode version 9.0.5 (9.0.5-elpaplus @ ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20170210/)

when archiving sections or exclude them from export I would expect them being exempt from being evaluated during export. The section archived or marked as ~:no export:~ is still evaluated and there is an error if the reference in the include file is no longer available. I get the error message

Re: [O] Bug: link beginning with parenthesis doesn't work [9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-474-g942b62 @ /home/joe/org-mode/lisp/)]

Hello, Joe Corneli writes: > The (xxx) form for a link target, especially one outside of a block, > doesn't seem to have meaning within the document model that Org > understands. Of course it does. It belongs to the link syntax. See, for example `org-link-search'