Hi Jean-Christophe,
Jean-Christophe Helary writes:
> What would be the best way to have writeroom mode called in one
> given capture template and not the others ?
I would you a (file+)function to get the location:
`(file+function "path/to/file"
"M. P." writes:
> Hello If I want to donate specifically to mobile org what would I do?
If you are referring to https://mobileorg.github.io, contacting the
authors would be the best way to know.
HTH,
--
Bastien
>
> Thanks Andreas. I am perhaps being to finicky. The problem with your
> approach is that you would end up permanently losing screen space for the R
> session. I don’t want the R session obstructing my writing when I am not
> working on code blocks. Ideally, the R session should appear only when
>
> for what it's worth, I usually run two windows (in the same frame),
> side-by-side, with emacs maximised.
> On the left I have my org file and on the right I have an R session, which I
> start immediately after I open my org file.
> When I use C-c ' on an R source block, the org buffer (on
Hi Vikas,
for what it's worth, I usually run two windows (in the same frame),
side-by-side, with emacs maximised.
On the left I have my org file and on the right I have an R session, which
I start immediately after I open my org file.
When I use C-c ' on an R source block, the org buffer (on the
>
> Vikas Rawal writes:
>
>> Isn’t is what most users need while editing the code block? The
>> possibility of evaluating the code to test and see what happens?
>
>
> Many languages do not support sessions. So, the only possibility to
> evaluate the code is
What would be the best way to have writeroom mode called in one given capture
template and not the others ?
Jean-Christophe
Hello If I want to donate specifically to mobile org what would I do?
I use termux with emacs and org installed in it. I use a hosting server
and sync org files to-from there.
On 1 July 2017 at 13:58, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Even if the window configuration is lost, I cannot see how the "*Org
> Note*" buffer could be closed. Are you certain it was not accessible
> anymore from the buffer list?
I do not remember and unfortunately I do not have
Hello,
Vikas Rawal writes:
> Isn’t is what most users need while editing the code block? The
> possibility of evaluating the code to test and see what happens?
Many languages do not support sessions. So, the only possibility to
evaluate the code is to
11 matches
Mail list logo