Re: [O] How to handle an inline multiline noweb reference

2018-12-01 Thread Grant Rettke
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:25 AM Marcin Borkowski wrote: > On 2018-11-28, at 03:08, Grant Rettke wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 3:57 AM Marcin Borkowski wrote: > >> but it's fairly complicated. Any better ideas? > > > > What is the part that you think is too complicated? > > I hoped that I

Re: [O] suppress ++ markup in orgmode?

2018-12-01 Thread Samuel Wales
On 11/21/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > You can use a zero-width space, like +++. that trick does not work on ===.

[O] set :var to string inline code

2018-12-01 Thread Charles Millar
Hi, I have recutils data base and from that I want to use inline source code to generate a list of names, addresses, etc. for instance the following inline code when exported in latex src_sh[:results raw :results replace :exports results :eval yes]{recsel -t InterestedParties -e "IPName='Ch

[O] org-envolve.el

2018-12-01 Thread David Arroyo Menendez
Hello, I've implemented a new file to contrib/lisp. It's called org-envolve.el, this file implements functions to help to format in org-mode from ASCII. For instance, you have a bash source that you are copying in your buffer, later you can call org-envolve-tags to add #+BEGIN_SRC bash in the beg

Re: [O] Feature request: simplify usage of special blocks (for beamer)

2018-12-01 Thread Carlos Pita
> (when (looking-at "[ \t]*#\\+BEGIN_\\S-+[ \t]+\\(\\S-+\\)") Sorry, it obviously should have been \\(.+\\) at the end. One thing the core parser could do is to put the remaining of the opening line of a special block into an :args or similar property of the special block element, leavi

Re: [O] Feature request: simplify usage of special blocks (for beamer)

2018-12-01 Thread Carlos Pita
> > 1. Allow for special blocks to take an :options argument. > > Although I agree that this would be nice, I imagine the difficulty would be > that it would be difficult to cater for multiple backends. It's not really difficult, more on the trivial side. For example, as an end user I already can

Re: [O] Feature request: simplify usage of special blocks (for beamer)

2018-12-01 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Saturday, 1 Dec 2018 at 13:24, Carlos Pita wrote: > Now, there are special blocks [1] also, and it's a pity they are not [...] > So my request would be: > > 1. Allow for special blocks to take an :options argument. Although I agree that this would be nice, I imagine the difficulty would be

[O] Feature request: simplify usage of special blocks (for beamer)

2018-12-01 Thread Carlos Pita
Hi all! The standard mapping from org structures to beamer structures introduces boilerplate: 1. At the bare minimum a properties drawer. 2. Then there is the tag. 3. But above all the need to add an ignoreheading subsection (with its drawer and everything) to introduce a little text between, say