Mikhail Skorzhinskii writes:
> Adam Porter writes:
> > However, the org-ql-block version runs in about 1/5th the time (0.7
> > seconds compared to 3.45 seconds on my collection of org-agenda-files).
>
> For some reason I thought that on average org-ql package is working
> slower then native
Samuel Wales writes:
> the idea was that we can resurrect the timeline view, for all agenda
> files instead of only one, merely by a use of a text search custom
> agenda view. timestamps go where categories currently go. sorted by
> that ts.
>
> if an entry has more than one ts (active bare,
> On Aug 31, 2019, at 4:42, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Jean-Christophe Helary writes:
>
>> When I use org-megaup I get a "Invalid function:
>> org-preserve-local-variables" is there a way to fix that ?
>>
>
> org-megaup is not defined AFAICT - do you mean `org-metaup'?
Yes, thank you. I'll
To be a little precise, Org mode PDF documents created using the default
Latex classes are not going to meet minimal accessibility standards. The
extent to which they can be accessed using accessibility software will
depend largely on the structure of the underlying PDF. I have not
investigated
thanks, looks gorgeous! i will file it for a possible future time
when i can run it, diff it with existing agenda to make sure it's the
same for me, and just switch over to it. (i use 2d and 7d agendas and
text search view with and without inactive.)
i'll ask a couple of questions.
a while
Okay, orgmode pdf files will be inaccessible for the foreseeable future.
Has anyone had any luck extracting text however mangled from one of
these with pdftotext or similar tools? If that's not possible that will
be another good thing to know.
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019, Tim Cross wrote:
> Date: Fri,
I think the main thing which needs to be in the PDF is structure
'tagging'. Unfortunately, making truly accessible PDFs is the one area
I've found where the 'TeX suite is weak. I was tracking some discussions
about this on the various TeX and Latex lists and it seems that to add
the necessary
Hello,
immanuel writes:
> #+NAME: this is a test
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :tangle no
>
> (message \"aha\") #+END_SRC
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :noweb yes :comments noweb :tangle out.el
> first
> <>
> second
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC elisp :tangle no
> (progn
> (org-babel-tangle)
> (with-temp-buffer
>
most of the books sold on google play books are speech-disabled by
publishers. The adobe accessibility site has speech-enabled
accessibility examples. I think it's a matter of a single control that
is either enabled or disabled. Oh, the IRS has speech-enabled pdf tax
forms anyone can download.
Hi,
I recently landed on this conversation:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-03/msg00802.html
Since I find myself quite often in a situation like the following:
* TODO abc [3/3]
- [X] a
- [X] b
- [X] c
I decided to dive more into Org's API, and I created this library [0]
Jude DaShiell writes:
> It would be helpful if when pdf get exported from orgmode they have
> speech enabled by default.
>
Not sure that org mode can do anything about, since it's LaTeX that produces
the PDF. That said, I'm not sure what needs to be done: what's the difference
between a
Jean-Christophe Helary writes:
> When I use org-megaup I get a "Invalid function:
> org-preserve-local-variables" is there a way to fix that ?
>
org-megaup is not defined AFAICT - do you mean `org-metaup'?
If not, disregard the rest of this message.
If yes, I don't see any problems, so you
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 8:23 AM John Kitchin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> 2. If you click on a citation link, you can select an action to copy the
> >> formatted entry for that key.
> >
> >
> > I had trouble with this. I constructed a minimal emacs config:
> >
> > #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> > ;;; elpa
It would be helpful if when pdf get exported from orgmode they have
speech enabled by default.
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019, John Hendy wrote:
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:45:08
> From: John Hendy
> To: Matt Price
> Cc: org-mode-email
> Subject: Re: [O] minimal testing setup for pdf export?
>
> Whew,
By the way, I've been using this for quite some time, and I find it quite
useful. It may be worth considering it for inclusion—see attached patch.
Opinions?
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 06:32, Michaël Cadilhac
wrote:
> Hi Leo;
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 17:46, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> > Michaël
Whew, the world is whole again! No worries, and I've been in the exact
same situation more than I'd like. We joke at work that if you want to
fix a problem, just ask someone to come watch it happen and it will
magically go away :)
Glad you're on your way!
John
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:27 AM
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:27 AM John Hendy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:34 PM Matt Price wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:33 PM John Kitchin
> wrote:
> >>
> >> that does suggest that pdflatex is getting called somewhere else.
> >>
> >> Maybe you can edebug the export
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
Adam Porter writes:
> However, the org-ql-block version runs in about 1/5th the time (0.7
> seconds compared to 3.45 seconds on my collection of org-agenda-files).
For some reason I thought that on average org-ql package is working
slower then native org-agenda searches. Probably because there
Samuel Wales writes:
> i have been watching these developments with interest. i want a
> faster 2-day agenda, and really like the idea of a lisp syntax for
> querying, perhaps one that can combine text search with structured.
>
> so just so it's known that there is otherwise silent interest.
>
Milan Zamazal writes:
> Hi Adam,
>
> thank you for the feature. I looked at org-ql and org-super-agenda (for
> the first time) and they look interesting. So interesting that I've
> decided to convert my agendas to it, with some improvements. It took a
> lot of effort and was sometimes tricky
21 matches
Mail list logo
