Yes, it is possible to use overlays in org beamer export.
Depending on what you want to achieve, there are a number of ways to do
this. One way in to introduce LaTeX directives directly. For instance,
#+begin_src org
1. The first point
2. The second one @@latex:{\only<2->\checkmark}@@
3.
Josiah Schwab writes:
> Hi Adam,
>
>> You may find org-ql helpful, as it makes selecting entries easy and
>> flexible.
>>
>> https://github.com/alphapapa/org-ql
>>
>> Here's an example that might help:
>>
>> https://github.com/alphapapa/org-ql/blob/master/examples.org#stuck-projects-block-agenda
Here is what I mean. Everything in these will be italic-only:
- /*italic, not bold*/
- /italic, *not bold*/
- /*italic*, not bold/
Is there a reason for not allowing multiple highlighters to start in the
same place?
Regards,
Dmitrii.
Hello,
Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
>Here is what I mean. Everything in these will be italic-only:
>
>- /*italic, not bold*/
>- /italic, *not bold*/
>- /*italic*, not bold/
>
>Is there a reason for not allowing multiple highlighters to start in the
> same place?
They are all
Hello,
Gustav Wikström writes:
> I'm starting out slow by making this a non-breaking change. At least
> I'm trying to. I.e. everything that worked before should continue to
> work.
This still is a syntax change, which is not to be taken lightly. Since
Org 9.3 is way overdue (I'm not blaming any
Hi,
Yes, how emacs renders this is what I meant.
Regards,
Dmitrii
сб, 7 сент. 2019 г. в 01:37, Nicolas Goaziou :
> Hello,
>
> Dmitrii Korobeinikov writes:
>
> >Here is what I mean. Everything in these will be italic-only:
> >
> >- /*italic, not bold*/
> >- /italic, *not bold*/
> >
Hi,
To avoid errors while running org-lint in an org file with many recutils
source blocks I have added the following to my init.el file
(setq recutils-babel-header-arg-names '(data type fields join sort groupby))
;; cmdline already included in org-babel-header-arg-names so not part
of abov
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 00:45 David Masterson wrote:
>> I see that, for tags picked up via inheritance from parent headlines,
>> when the tags are produced in the agenda, the current agenda item will
>> have an extra colon after the inherited tags. Is this by design?
On 8/30/19, Adam Porter wrote:
>> also, does it support all the usual variables for leaders and faces and so
>> on?
>
> I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Formatting of entries is not
i was merely trying to get a sense of the degree to which it is a
drop-in replacement (which i think you have s
Hi David
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 1:14 AM David Masterson
wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 00:45 David Masterson
> wrote:
>
> >> I see that, for tags picked up via inheritance from parent headlines,
> >> when the tags are produced in the agenda, the current agenda it
10 matches
Mail list logo