I write an elisp config for Org Mode to auto evaluate inline source block in
property "EVAL".
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defcustom org-property-eval-keywords-list '("EVAL")
"A list of property keywords for evaluate code."
:type 'list
:safe #'listp
:group 'org)
(defun
There is no great answer I am aware of. However, I will sometimes
generate a markdown version of the source so that at least non-emacs
users have a slightly better chance of being able to view the source in
a more format friendly manner than a 'raw' org file. However, pull
requests and the like
On 12/10/2020 10:22, Christian Moe wrote:
>
> Hi, Daniele,
>
> Good that it's working for you. I'll try to explain the unclear parts.
>
> Daniele Nicolodi writes:
>
>> On 24/09/2020 11:17, Christian Moe wrote:
>>
>>> Now, with the Calc command to simplify units, you can add dollars to
>>>
>>> "CB" == Colin Baxter writes:
>> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> Hello I have a org file that I want to export either to
>> 1. Regular latex or
>> 2. To beamer.
>> So I just use the corresponding export engines.
>> However the following minimal example puzzles me:
>> #+begin_src
>> # -*-
> Uwe Brauer writes:
> Hello I have a org file that I want to export either to
> 1. Regular latex or
> 2. To beamer.
> So I just use the corresponding export engines.
> However the following minimal example puzzles me:
> #+begin_src
> # -*-
hi. i apologize if this has been asked before (especially if by me).
but, since i had a question recently about Org Src... buffers, this came
up.
i'm wondering what people do who want to release a non-emacs'y package
(an R package, say, or ...), and who did their development "from within"
a .org
Hello
I have a org file that I want to export either to
1. Regular latex or
2. To beamer.
So I just use the corresponding export engines.
However the following minimal example puzzles me:
#+begin_src
# -*- org-confirm-babel-evaluate: nil -*-
#+LATEX_HEADER_EXTRA:
On Thursday, 15 Oct 2020 at 16:03, Colin Baxter wrote:
> Is there any reason why you don't use LaTeX's \leftarrow in place of ← ?
> With perhaps a (set-input-method 'TeX).
Funnily enough, it's because I was originally using the TeX input method
(which I love) that I ended up with ← instead of
Hello Eric,
> Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Thursday, 15 Oct 2020 at 12:31, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>> In my case there is a specific pseudocode format I need to use. I
>> think I would have to try to tune one of these packages pretty
>> heavily.
> In that case, you may simply
Eric S Fraga writes:
> In that case, you may simply wish to use the alltt environment. This
> works for me:
>
> #+begin_src org
> ,* algorithm pseudo code
> ,#+latex_header: \usepackage{alltt}
> ,#+begin_alltt
> for i \in [0,1] do
> if i \neq 3
> x ← i^2
> end if
> end
Maxim Nikulin writes:
What is the easiest way to combine monospace and special symbols?
>>>
>>> Is there any problem with UTF-8 symbols such as "≠"? I have typed it using
>>> Compose / =
>>
>> At least out of the box, the UTF-8 symbol is not exported.
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
>
Jarmo Hurri wrote:
Maxim Nikulin writes:
Jarmo Hurri wrote:
What is the easiest way to combine monospace and special symbols?
Is there any problem with UTF-8 symbols such as "≠"? I have typed it using
Compose / =
At least out of the box, the UTF-8 symbol is not exported.
#+BEGIN_SRC
On Thursday, 15 Oct 2020 at 12:31, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
> In my case there is a specific pseudocode format I need to use. I think
> I would have to try to tune one of these packages pretty heavily.
In that case, you may simply wish to use the alltt environment. This
works for me:
#+begin_src org
Hello.
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>> What is the easiest way to combine monospace and special symbols?
>
> Is there any problem with UTF-8 symbols such as "≠"? I have typed it using
> Compose / =
At least out of the box, the UTF-8 symbol is not exported.
All the best,
Jarmo
Hi there.
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I resort to LaTeX for this, using a LaTeX src block with the algorithm
> and algpseudocode packages.
In my case there is a specific pseudocode format I need to use. I think
I would have to try to tune one of these packages pretty heavily.
But I will see.
Hi there!
Colin Baxter writes:
> Would https://github.com/jsalzbergedu/pseudocode-mode be any good?
I will have to explore it. The documentation is almost as thin as my
wallet.
Thanks,
Jarmo
> Jarmo Hurri writes:
> Greetings.
> I like to embed pseudocode etc. in example blocks so that it is
> typeset in monospace when exported. But sometimes I would need
> special symbols, such as \neq, in pseudocode. What is the easiest
> way to combine monospace and
On Thursday, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:13, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
> I like to embed pseudocode etc. in example blocks so that it is typeset
> in monospace when exported. But sometimes I would need special symbols,
> such as \neq, in pseudocode. What is the easiest way to combine
> monospace and special
Jarmo Hurri wrote:
I like to embed pseudocode etc. in example blocks so that it is typeset
in monospace when exported. But sometimes I would need special symbols,
such as \neq, in pseudocode. What is the easiest way to combine
monospace and special symbols?
Is there any problem with UTF-8
Greetings.
I like to embed pseudocode etc. in example blocks so that it is typeset
in monospace when exported. But sometimes I would need special symbols,
such as \neq, in pseudocode. What is the easiest way to combine
monospace and special symbols?
Jarmo
20 matches
Mail list logo
