Probably a silly question, but in ob-R.el, what is the reason for
setting na=\"nil\" when defining org-babel-R-write-object-command? Is
this an elisp compatibility thing?
Regardless, I generally (always?) want na=\"\" for this, so I am finding
all those "nil"s very annoying, and the only way th
by activate i mean display, in echo area, whatever it is i want to
display. i think help-echo is a text property, and i might or might
not want to display it, depending. and i might want to display the
other stuff even if there is no help-echo.
i use [and adore] org-link-minor mode in elisp mode
On 2021-01-14, TEC wrote:
> TEC writes:
>
>>> Sorry, I still see the flycheck warning and "&" for "&".
>> Maybe I accidently sent you the old patches? I'll check tomorrow.
>
> Hah, I check and guess what I see? The changes were unstaged 😂.
>
> Sorry about that, here's an actual revision.
Thi
This thread has dragged on ages, and if no-one else is following this
chain I wouldn't blame them in the slightest.
To help indicate that this is actually ready (at last) now, I'm just
going to add that info the the subject line in the hope it helps Bastien
or any others notice that this is actu
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
Hi,
I have just started using `org-mode`, and it is very cool ! Thank you
for your collective work.
There is a small patch I would like to submit : when writing listings
for the OCaml programming language, one should use the "[Objective]Caml"
dialect, which is different from the "Caml" diale
TEC writes:
>> Sorry, I still see the flycheck warning and "&" for "&".
> Maybe I accidently sent you the old patches? I'll check tomorrow.
Hah, I check and guess what I see? The changes were unstaged 😂.
Sorry about that, here's an actual revision.
--
Timothy
>From 3ab8b4f108c8cfa4b0bf11
> this is an interesting discussion. is there any side discussion that
> takes into account both mouse and cursor?
Indeed, you can see a side discussion at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-11/msg00885.html
where we discussed highlighting the completion candidate
the same way wh
