Currently texinfo uses tex as the underlying process to create the typeset
document. After talking to Gavin Smith, for texinfo to be able to use latex,
would require using latex to print the document, which necessitates a new
implementation. Do we have a latex implementation with the Official Gnu
Uwe Brauer writes:
> Footnotes:
> [1] I am forced to modify each year our course guides. These guides are
> written (no joke) in MS Office format pre-97. It has complex but badly
> formatted tables that makes it impossible to edit with anything
> than MS Office (or the markup is
Christopher Dimech writes:
> It is a good package, but since it is inactive, org-mode could assimilate
> it so people can use it, rather than in the form of an external package.
I don't see any advantage in doing this. It is simple to include the
package. Furthermore, if we start to bundle it,
Christopher Dimech writes:
>> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 2:06 AM
>> From: "Eric S Fraga"
>> To: "Christopher Dimech"
>> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
>> Subject: Re: algorithm capabilities for org-mode
>>
>> On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 15:39, Christopher Dimech wrote:
>> > The license release
Tim Visher writes:
> Hi Juan Manuel,
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:31 PM Juan Manuel Macías
> wrote:
>
> Try setting this variable to non-nil:
>
> (setq org-export-with-broken-links t)
>
> Thanks for the tip here! This is definitely close to what I want. I think I'm
> going to need to code
I'm making my first foray into publishing a project. I'm running GNU
Emacs 26.2 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2019-04-13, on Windows 10.
I've defined a single project, just to try it out and learn. Here is
the relevant portion of my .emacs file
;; Projects and publishing
;;
(setq org-publish
Hi Tim,
Tim Visher writes:
> What I really want is something that keeps the link text but drops the
> link, essentially converting it into plain text (or stylized text if
> the link text is in markup).
According to the `org-export-with-broken-links' docstring:
--
Could we buy "the whole pack"?
The physical dictionary, the digital (orgmode) format, the emacs and latex
whole configuration and packages, etc?
Or would it be useless for the profanes as me?
Congratulations!
Hi Juan Manuel,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:31 PM Juan Manuel Macías
wrote:
> Try setting this variable to non-nil:
>
> (setq org-export-with-broken-links t)
>
Thanks for the tip here! This is definitely close to what I want. I think
I'm going to need to code up something additional though in tha
> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 2:06 AM
> From: "Eric S Fraga"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: algorithm capabilities for org-mode
>
> On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 15:39, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > The license released under is incompatible with the GPL.
>>> "BD" == Bruce D'Arcus writes:
> I recently switched to one-sentence-per-line + visual-line-mode.
That I do in Auctex mode (actually I use a filling function by Ingo Lohmar, I
found in
http://pleasefindattached.blogspot.com/2011/12/emacsauctex-sentence-fill-greatly.html
link does not wor
>>> "BD" == Bruce D'Arcus writes:
> I recently switched to one-sentence-per-line + visual-line-mode.
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:00 AM John Kitchin wrote:
>>
>> I use visual-line-mode. It almost always works fine for me.
In my experience the best I found was
(defun my-turn-on-longlines-in-a
On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 16:38, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Coming back to your original post. I finally downloaded it and had a
> quick look at its source org file.
>
> You are using longlines (that is now auto-fill after 70 chars).
>
> I never found a longline mode I liked and that is why I stick to go
I recently switched to one-sentence-per-line + visual-line-mode.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:00 AM John Kitchin wrote:
>
> I use visual-line-mode. It almost always works fine for me.
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Uwe Brauer wrote:
>>
>> >>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
>>
>> > On Friday,
I use visual-line-mode. It almost always works fine for me.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:38 AM Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
>
> > On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 13:55, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >> Right, fair enough. I thought it was MS Office or something like
> this.[1]
>
> > Yeah
>>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 13:55, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> Right, fair enough. I thought it was MS Office or something like this.[1]
> Yeah; I avoid that problem mostly by using ODT export in org.
> Sometimes, if I have to work on an actual document that LibreOffi
On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 15:39, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> The license released under is incompatible with the GPL.
So? It doesn't stop anybody using it. It's not as if we need to ship
it with org, for instance. Are you going to propose we also
re-implement all the other packages many of us u
Wow, that publication looks pro!
Absolutely beautiful!
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 8:11 AM, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to share here my latest work. It has recently been
> published in Spain and I think it's the first dictionary made entirely
> using Org Mode ;-) I have taken
It is a good package, but since it is inactive, org-mode could assimilate
it so people can use it, rather than in the form of an external package.
Defining the structure of an algorithm in a document is of value.
Can one do something similar using current code or does the algorithmicx
package have
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 at 9:22 PM
> From: "Eric S Fraga"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: algorithm capabilities for org-mode
>
> On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:32, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > It was done Szász János and released in 2005, but is tod
On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:14, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Duh. Fixed. Thank you.
Confirmed! Thank you. :-)
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-557-gceb78e
: Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
On Friday, 18 Jun 2021 at 13:55, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Right, fair enough. I thought it was MS Office or something like this.[1]
Yeah; I avoid that problem mostly by using ODT export in org.
Sometimes, if I have to work on an actual document that LibreOffice or
gnumeric cannot handle, I access our
Congratulations! Looks just beautyful!
Detlef
Am Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:11:19 +
schrieb Juan Manuel Macías :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to share here my latest work. It has recently been
> published in Spain and I think it's the first dictionary made entirely
> using Org Mode ;-) I have taken care
Congratulations! That looks like an amazing project.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:11 AM Juan Manuel Macías
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to share here my latest work. It has recently been
> published in Spain and I think it's the first dictionary made entirely
> using Org Mode ;-) I have taken care
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Ummm partly? The parsing seems to have been fixed but now my agenda
> view is completely wrong. Timed entries are not showing in the time
> line and the actual times for those entries are not appearing.
Duh. Fixed. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi,
I would like to share here my latest work. It has recently been
published in Spain and I think it's the first dictionary made entirely
using Org Mode ;-) I have taken care of its production and its editorial
design:
Diccionario Hispánico de la Tradición Clásica
(Hispanic Dictionary of Classic
>>> "ESF" == Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 21:54, Uwe Brauer wrote:
>> I wonder what that software might be ;-)
> Actually, in this case, it isn't one of the usual suspects. I use Linux
> for everything so I have pretty much found open source solutions to all
> my usual req
On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:32, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> It was done Szász János and released in 2005, but is today inactive.
Inactive does not mean not useful. The package works and works
well. There is really no need for "activity" on it.
I fail to see the need to re-invent the wheel.
On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:30, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>> When I try this now, with org up to date from git, I get this backtrace:
>>>
>>> ,
>>> | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Invalid duration format: \"3pm\"")
>
> Fixed
>
> (hopefully)
Ummm partly? The p
On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:19, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> The algorithmicx latex package has a very annoying licence, the LaTeX
> Project Public License. Although a free software license, it
> incompatible with the GPL with many requirements.
And? I'm not sure of the relevance. I use many
On Thursday, 17 Jun 2021 at 21:54, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> I wonder what that software might be ;-)
Actually, in this case, it isn't one of the usual suspects. I use Linux
for everything so I have pretty much found open source solutions to all
my usual requirements. This particular case is a modelli
Hi All,
I use org-mode clock table to generate report for the tasks I clocked.
The header of my clock table looks like this:
#+BEGIN: clocktable :block 2021-06-18 :scope agenda :maxlevel 5
:fileskip0 t :link t
I have :link t so that I can jump to a task directly from the clock
table. I have notic
32 matches
Mail list logo
