I am likely doing this wrong but will describe what has been done.
I put an agenda time stamp into a field in test.org and add +4w to the end
of the time stamp inside the >.
I get on the left of the field column on the vertical character and type
control-space to set mark.
I move to the end of the
Hello Eddie
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 16:15, Eddie Drury wrote:
>
> When I am working in an indirect buffer and am currently clocked into a
> subheading. If I refile this subheading and then run org-clock-out, I get the
> error "Clock start time is gone".
I'm not sure if this is intended
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:06 PM Nick Dokos wrote:
> Matt Price writes:
>
> > Christian et al,
> >
> > I seem to have broken something while fiddling around and I can't quite
> make out what. Would someone be willing to check for me whether this does
> or does not produce the desired full
Hi
Not sure whether this is off topic, but it concerns orgalist-mode:
When I use virtual-fill-mode together with orgalist-mode in mail buffers: When
I turn virtual-auto-fill-mode off and auto-fill-mode on, the lists are nicely
filled as:
1. The first item blab bladnka bladnfkand
Matt Price writes:
> Christian et al,
>
> I seem to have broken something while fiddling around and I can't quite make
> out what. Would someone be willing to check for me whether this does or does
> not produce the desired full table? Right now I am again getting a truncated
> result and
Christian et al,
I seem to have broken something while fiddling around and I can't quite
make out what. Would someone be willing to check for me whether this does
or does not produce the desired full table? Right now I am again getting a
truncated result and I'm not fully sure what I might be
Am 20.07.2021 um 15:50 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Denis Maier wrote:
This leads to problems with automatic citations, especially when you also use
"ibid." and such...
Bla [cite:@doe].
Blabla (Gen 1).
Bla [cite:@doe].
=>
Bla (Doe 2020).
Blabla (Gen 1).
Bla
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Denis Maier wrote:
> > Certainly in the CSL world, this has never been supported, and I don't
> > ever recall it ever coming up (though I'm sure someone on the Zotero
> > forum raised it at some point)
>
> I'm pretty sure I've brought that up at some point :-)
I'm working on a select-style function for org-cite, where I am adding
previews to the style list.
Current screenshot, with the natbib mapping:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1134/126326341-15ec2046-bf34-411a-a7d8-f2cbe85769c3.png
But to do that best and most consistently (next step
Am 20.07.2021 um 13:41 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:48 PM John Kitchin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
John Kitchin writes:
> Who is to say why someone would bother. It is a command on page two
> of http://tug.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/natbib/natnotes.pdf that
> one can use.
Hmmm... but I would say that the natbib command \citetext is more a
helper/workaround for the missing prefix/suffix
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:48 PM John Kitchin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
>>
>> > In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
>> > textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
>> > associated with it.
>>
>>
Hi everyone,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> It took years, but citations are now full part of Org syntax.
Sorry to be late to the party, but congratulations and thanks to all of
those who worked on this, especially Nicolas, Bruce, Denis and András!
It's really wonderful to see this work come to
On Monday, 19 Jul 2021 at 14:52, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> I used to have a global bibliography that my employees all used. Every
> project also had a local bibliography for citations that didn't appear
> in the global bibliography. At the end of a project, after the editor
> had cleaned up the
Le mardi 20 juillet 2021 à 02:55 -0400, Matt Price a écrit :
> Certainly citation of personal communications is common in the fields
> of history and philosophy of science, where it represents an effort
> to responsibly represent the source of ideas owed to other persons.
I don't dispute that.
>
Le lundi 19 juillet 2021 à 20:47 -0400, John Kitchin a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
> It is also possible to use \nocite{*} as a cite, which includes all
> references from a bibliography, and yet contains no key.
Hence your reluctance to work from a set of larger databases, which
would include
Certainly citation of personal communications is common in the fields of
history and philosophy of science, where it represents an effort to
responsibly represent the source of ideas owed to other persons. It's not
really a question of whether you personally would do it; it's a question of
17 matches
Mail list logo