Robert,
i have the following commented out in my .emacs. i have no memory of
it, why i put it in, why i took it out, or if it might provide you any
clue. but, with all those caveats...
;; in org-mode, display images inline after execution
;; except, after a while, this gets tiresome. one c
Kyle Meyer writes:
>> 3. The entry in NEWS for the Org mode update mentions ORG-NEWS, but it
>> doesn't say how to get to it. (Yes, I know how to get to ORG-NEWS from
>> NEWS. Do we expect random users to understand the layout of an
>> installed Emacs at that level of detail?)
>
> And I guess t
close 52341
quit
Kyle Meyer writes:
> I suppose one solution would be to check for " " and translate that to
> the ?\s so that the remove is triggered. I'll plan to apply the change
> below to Org's bugfix branch in a day or two unless the author of the
> above commit (+cc) or someone else has a
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Russell Adams writes:
>
>> Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files,
>> or did this change just break some of the finer formatting details of
>> your exported Org file?
>
> The change to electr
Mike Kupfer writes:
> Finding ORG-NEWS seems harder than it should be.
>
> 1. The "Browse Org News" menu item (Org > Documentation > Browse Org
> News) isn't adequate, because it takes you to orgmode.org. The package
> description (C-h P org RET) has the same problem. If you're working
> offline
forcemerge 52341 52392
quit
Bruce E. Robertson writes:
> 1. in init.el:
> (custom-set-variables
> '(org-priority-default 32)
> '(org-priority-highest 0)
> '(org-priority-lowest 31)
> )
> 2. position to line in .org file:
[...]
This looks like a duplicate of https://debbugs.gnu.org/52341 (whic
Russell Adams writes:
> Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files,
> or did this change just break some of the finer formatting details of
> your exported Org file?
The change to electric indent broke my workflow badly (always having to
undo the indentation after eve
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> This looks great indeed but I've failed to reproduce in my
> environment.
Thanks for testing this Sébastien.
> I couldn't get ~org--match-text-baseline-ascent~ to compute the
> ascent : the ~xml-get-attribute~ call returns
> : ("-16.945024" "12.153473" "16.148855" "
Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> Jumping into the "real world", how about these two examples of nested
> emphasis?
By the way, what do you think about allowing the use of some kind of
aliases, so that the aspect is less verbose? Maybe something like "(i::"
instead of "(italic () ..."? I came up with
Dear All,
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 10:54, Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote:
> Thinking about the new org-cite, which is orgmode's native citation solution,
> I'm wondering if it would be easier to use org-cite within orgmode and export
> to ODT? A small example with configuration suggestion will be highl
i think the big change was v9.
On 12/9/21, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 Dec 2021 at 16:21, Russell Adams wrote:
>> Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files,
>> or did this change just break some of the finer formatting details of
>> your exported Org file?
>
Hi,
Matt Huszagh writes:
I feel that maybe it would be useful to attach screenshots to show the
improvement from this patch? Anyway, I've attached two images: one with
the correct baseline alignment to surrounding text and the other with
the current, incorrect, baseline alignment.
I think a lot
I’m trying to use Org mode like a Jupyter notebook. I’ve got something working,
but for graphic plots, I have to call `org-display-inline-images` after every
call to `org-babel-execute-src-block`. I guess there is a work-around,
described here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54269390/how-t
Hello,
I think I've found a bug in the agenda display when
'org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks' is set to 'invisible', and there is a task
that is a habit (i.e., 'STYLE' property set to 'habit') and is blocked
(e.g., because 'org-enforce-todo-dependencies' is set to 't' or there is
an 'ORDERED' propert
Hello,
I'm not sure what is the expected behaviour of the COMMENT keyword for
TODOs and the agenda, since I only found it in the "Exporting" section
of the manual, but I find the following behaviour inconsistent:
- Tasks with a COMMENT keyword or under a heading with a COMMENT keyword
do not ap
Hi Chris,
Le 29 Nov 2021, chris a écrit :
> I use footnote 53 from https://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-Tags.html[1].
> I put my tags in `tags-file.org`, using `#+TAGS:`.
> I've put the next two lines in `init.el`.
>
> (setq org-agenda-files (list "~/path-to/tags-file.org")
> org-complete
Hi, I'm using fresh git copies of emacs and orgmode on an Ubuntu 21.10
VM with the following commit levels from git log -1:
emacs:
commit 6ecb24f877242371a0dbc7938e9b408df2690dc7 (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
orgmode:
commit 14ed651db0ef822d1b5491a376b66283da9b9349 (HEAD -> main,
On Wednesday, 8 Dec 2021 at 17:33, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> If you like Selectrum (Vertico is another recent, similar,
> alternative), you might give citar a try.
>
> https://github.com/bdarcus/citar
+1
Works very well for me with selectrum.
--
: Eric S Fraga, with org release_9.5.1-243-gad53c5
On Thursday, 9 Dec 2021 at 16:21, Russell Adams wrote:
> Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files,
> or did this change just break some of the finer formatting details of
> your exported Org file?
It's been a while but, IIRC, the latter to a large extent; I should hav
Max Nikulin writes:
> Looking into your code I have realized that it should be implemented
> using filter, not through :export property of links. Maybe without
> working proof of concept with link exporters, this session of
> monkey-typing would not be successful.
Jumping into the "real world"
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:46:34AM +, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Org v8 in particular was a major step forward but broke many of my
> org files.
I know we're beating a dead horse, but can you clarify.
Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files,
or did this change just br
If you are trying to use org-ref for this see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRR-5NSpKyE and this example:
https://github.com/jkitchin/org-ref/blob/master/examples/basic-csl.org#opendocument.
You need to use a preprocessing hook (org-ref-csl-preprocess-buffer) with
org-ref to get the citations and
On 09/12/2021 14:01, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
John Kitchin writes:
Have you seen
https://github.com/tj64/org-dp? It seems to do a lot with creating and
manipulating org elements. It might either be handy or lead to some
inspiration.
Interesting package. Thanks for sharing.
Either I missed
On Wednesday, 8 Dec 2021 at 17:16, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> If you have 1400 slides of lectures, all carefully laid out to convey
Been there, done that. 😞 I've learned to not upgrade org (or Emacs) for
a few weeks before the start of term!
I am a big fan of backwards compatibility but
I have been using org-ref and biblatex. They export well to PDF, through
LaTeX. I am able to export to ODT as well. However, I'm not able to have
the bibliography or the references in the produced ODT.
I searched online and found this tutorial:
https://kjambunathan.github.io/org-mode-ox-odt/Biblio
Timothy writes:
> For the sake of staying vaguely on-track, I think it’s worth noting that
> Ihor’s
> comments make no mention of changing the Org syntax, or creating an abstract
> definition (that has existed as a WIP for years).
I think Dr. Babenhauser referred to another ongoing thread "Raw
Hi Arne,
> I am wording this so strongly because we currently have talk about
> creating more abstract org syntax.
>
> This is the situation in which the temptation to skip backwards
> compatibility is highest — as is the cost of that, because not updating
> will quickly not be an option (because
Tim Cross writes:
> Russell Adams writes:
>> That Org can also be used to export to other formats is both a
>> blessing and a curse. Org can only do high level constructs in the
>> languages it exports to, and really should only be expected to do just
>> that. It's a paper thin macro or templ
Tim Cross writes:
> What really doesn't help is to immediately jump to extremes and start
> talking about making something volatile just because change is
> mentioned.
I am wording this so strongly because we currently have talk about
creating more abstract org syntax.
This is the situation in
29 matches
Mail list logo
