Ihor,
Your patch may be an improvement, but it requires an additional fix, see
below.
However, in my opinion, it does not address original Craig's issue. The
patch improves handling of *non-text* files requiring *external*
viewers, while Craig complained that behavior for shell script is
in
Ypo writes:
> I wanted to export my # comments so I could share my notes with more people,
> using HTML export. I would export all of them.
>
> But, as it seems not possible, I think I will use footnotes. I liked #
> comments more, because their face can be customized and because they are
> ne
Hi, Timothy
I wanted to export my # comments so I could share my notes with more people,
using HTML export. I would export all of them.
But, as it seems not possible, I think I will use footnotes. I liked # comments
more, because their face can be customized and because they are nearer to the
to op: do you mean to sometimes export comments and sometimes not?
On 5/28/22, Timothy wrote:
> Hi Ypo,
>
> Well, `#+begin_comment' is for content you /don’t/ want exported, but if you
> want to
> add a note to be included in exports, try `#+begin_note'.
>
> All the best,
> Timothy
>
--
The K
Hi Ypo,
Well, `#+begin_comment' is for content you /don’t/ want exported, but if you
want to
add a note to be included in exports, try `#+begin_note'.
All the best,
Timothy
Thanks, Timothy
Do you mean blocks like #+BEGIN_COMMENT ?
Does that kind of blocks already exist?
https://i.ibb.co/xHJDgCR/Captura.jpg
Ypo
El 28/05/2022 a las 17:44, Timothy escribió:
Hi Ypo,
As I understand it, the whole point of comments is that they’re not
exported. Perhaps you’re lo
Hi Ypo,
As I understand it, the whole point of comments is that they’re not exported.
Perhaps you’re looking for note blocks instead?
All the best,
Timothy
Is it possible to export the (# comments)? I haven't seen that option in
org export general customization.
I am making some (# comments) to texts, and I would like to export them
when I export the subtree to HTML.
Best regards,
Ypo
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> If you want all the drawers in all the children to be opened, you can
> instead do the following:
>
> (let* ((headline (save-excursion (org-back-to-heading)
> (org-element-at-point
> (when headline
> (org-fold-region
> (org-element-property :begin headline
Tor Kringeland writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Sure. Now, you need to call a different function to open all the drawers
>> unconditionally. That function is:
>>
> Thanks! This almost imitates the old behavior, except that all drawers
> (i.e., including sub-headlines) would be opened when
Tor Kringeland writes:
> a part of was opened. (So pressing TAB multiple times would first show
> the outline with the first headline open, then the next would show
> sub-headlines with their drawers open.)
Correction: it wouldn't show the drawer of the headline on the first TAB
press. But on
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Sure. Now, you need to call a different function to open all the drawers
> unconditionally. That function is:
>
> (let* ((headline (save-excursion (org-back-to-heading)
> (org-element-at-point)))
>(section (org-element-lineage
>(org-element-at-poi
Uwe Brauer writes:
> I have also to confess, that I usually am I bit hesitant to use
> defadvice since it changes the vanilla function, and might cause
> problems, but maybe this is just me.
You are absolutely right, and I confess that I would have the same
precautions :-). Also, the defadvice co
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> A more advanced approach would be using
> \include + \includeonly instead of \input:
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20160627050806/http://www.howtotex.com/tips-tricks/faster-latex-part-i-compile-only-parts/
Yeah, \include and \includeonly save the .aux files for each par
>>> "JMM" == Juan Manuel Macías writes:
> Uwe Brauer writes:
>> When I run it I obtain
>> if: Symbol’s value as variable is void: my-latex-export-path
>>
>> Another point is if I decide to export it to ods, I need to modify that
>> advice, but I agree the new function is more convenient.
> You
Uwe Brauer writes:
> When I run it I obtain
> if: Symbol’s value as variable is void: my-latex-export-path
>
> Another point is if I decide to export it to ods, I need to modify that
> advice, but I agree the new function is more convenient.
You must add the variables to the document as local va
On Sat, 28 May 2022 at 01:52, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> (...)
Hi Ihor,
I think that you are underestimating how alien eev is for most people.
Let me suppose that what you mean by your comments is this:
"I've spent N minutes watching this video - for N big - and I feel
that I've learned very
17 matches
Mail list logo
